Asai G, Ando Y, Saka H, Ando M, Sugiura S, Sakai S, Hasegawa Y, Shimokata K
First Department of Internal Medicine, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya Ekisaikai Hospital, Japan.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Nov-Dec;54(9-10):725-7. doi: 10.1007/s002280050542.
The aim of this study was to develop limited sampling models for estimating the area under the concentration-versus-time curve (AUC) of carboplatin.
Based on pharmacokinetic analyses of 14 patients who received 300 mg x m2 of carboplatin over a 90-min infusion following irinotecan, we developed limited sampling models with stepwise multiple linear regression analysis. We validated these models to be unbiased and precise using pharmacokinetic data of a second group of 14 patients. We also compared the observed and the predicted AUC in the patients using Calvert's formula with the patients' renal function.
We developed the following models: AUC (mg x ml(-1) x min) = 0.784 x C4 + 1.30 (r2=0.930) and AUC=0.100 x C0.25 + 0.597 x C4 + 0.140 (r=0.992), where C0.25 and C4 denote unbound plasma concentrations (microg x ml(-1)) of carboplatin at 0.25 h and 4 h after the end of infusion, respectively. These models were validated to be unbiased and precise: a mean prediction error (MPE) with standard deviation (SD) = 2.41 (9.45)% and a root mean squared error (RMSE) = 9.42% for the one-sample model, and MPE with (SD) = 1.22 (5.56)% and RMSE = 5.49% for the two-sample model. We also calculated predicted AUC in the patients using Calvert's formula: MPE with (SD)= -5.87 (21.5)% and RMSE = 21.5%.
These estimations were, as expected, more accurate than the prediction using Calvert's formula based on patients' renal function. The result of this study confirmed the idea that the pharmacokinetic parameters derived from limited sampling models would be more suitable for pharmacokinetic analysis of carboplatin than those obtained using Calvert's formula.
本研究旨在建立有限采样模型,用于估算卡铂的血药浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)。
基于对14例接受伊立替康治疗后在90分钟内输注300mg/m²卡铂患者的药代动力学分析,我们采用逐步多元线性回归分析建立了有限采样模型。我们使用另一组14例患者的药代动力学数据验证了这些模型的无偏性和精确性。我们还比较了使用卡尔弗特公式并结合患者肾功能计算出的患者AUC观测值和预测值。
我们建立了以下模型:AUC(mg·ml⁻¹·min)= 0.784×C4 + 1.30(r² = 0.930)以及AUC = 0.100×C0.25 + 0.597×C4 + 0.140(r = 0.992),其中C0.25和C4分别表示输注结束后0.25小时和4小时时卡铂的游离血浆浓度(μg·ml⁻¹)。这些模型经验证具有无偏性和精确性:单样本模型的平均预测误差(MPE)及标准差(SD)= 2.41(9.45)%,均方根误差(RMSE)= 9.42%;两样本模型的MPE及(SD)= 1.22(5.56)%,RMSE = 5.49%。我们还使用卡尔弗特公式计算了患者的预测AUC:MPE及(SD)= -5.87(21.5)%,RMSE = 21.5%。
正如预期的那样,这些估算比基于患者肾功能使用卡尔弗特公式进行的预测更为准确。本研究结果证实了这样一种观点,即从有限采样模型得出的药代动力学参数比使用卡尔弗特公式获得的参数更适合卡铂的药代动力学分析。