Eek Elsy, Engardt Margareta
Department of Geriatric Medicine, NLPO, Danderyd Hospital, Danderyd, Sweden.
Clin Rehabil. 2003 Dec;17(8):825-34. doi: 10.1177/026921550301700803.
To evaluate the inter-rater reliability and reliability between occasions of assessing the perceptual threshold of touch (PTT) with high-frequency transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (Hf/TENS) in elderly patients with stroke.
A test-retest study of reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and limits of agreement.
Geriatric rehabilitation unit.
Thirty-two consecutive patients with stroke > or = 65 years of age.
Two-channel current stimulator TENS CEFAR Tempo with four self-adhesive skin electrodes. The stimulator delivered a high-frequency constant current of 40 Hz. The strength of the stimulation was quantifiable and assessed in milliampere (mA).
The assessments were performed on the hands and feet by two raters. The PTT was identified as the level registered in milliampere (mA) at which the patients perceived a tingling sensation.
The ICC values (0.94-0.99) were shown to be good for inter-rater reliability, as well as reliability between occasions. However an additional analysis with limits of agreement showed a high level of agreement for assessment of the hand but a moderate to low agreement for assessment of the foot where some bias was also identified. Clinical acceptable reliability: > or = 1 mA for the hand and > or = 5 mA for the foot are so far recommended for establishing real differences in clinical measures.
Hf/TENS shows an overall high reliability for assessing the PTT of the hand and moderate to low reliability for the foot. Additional research with exclusion of bias is needed to determine the reliability of assessing the foot.
评估老年中风患者使用高频经皮电神经刺激(Hf/TENS)评估触觉感知阈值(PTT)时,评估者间信度及不同测量次数间的信度。
采用组内相关系数(ICC)和一致性界限进行信度的重测研究。
老年康复科。
32例年龄≥65岁的连续中风患者。
带有四个自粘皮肤电极的双通道电流刺激器TENS CEFAR Tempo。该刺激器发出40Hz的高频恒流。刺激强度可量化,以毫安(mA)为单位进行评估。
由两名评估者对手和脚进行评估。PTT被确定为患者感知到刺痛感时以毫安(mA)记录的水平。
ICC值(0.94 - 0.99)表明评估者间信度以及不同测量次数间的信度良好。然而,一致性界限的额外分析显示,手部评估的一致性较高,但足部评估的一致性为中度至低度,且还发现了一些偏差。目前推荐手部临床可接受信度≥1 mA,足部≥5 mA,以确定临床测量中的实际差异。
Hf/TENS在评估手部PTT方面总体具有较高信度,而在评估足部PTT方面信度为中度至低度。需要进行排除偏差的进一步研究,以确定评估足部的信度。