养老院和家庭护理环境中晚期痴呆症患者的临终关怀。
Terminal care for persons with advanced dementia in the nursing home and home care settings.
作者信息
Mitchell Susan L, Morris John N, Park Pil S, Fries Brant E
机构信息
Hebrew Rehabilitation Center for Aged Research and Training Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
出版信息
J Palliat Med. 2004 Dec;7(6):808-16. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2004.7.808.
BACKGROUND
Many older persons with advanced dementia receive terminal care in nursing homes, others remain in the community with home care services.
OBJECTIVES
To describe and compare the end-of-life experience of persons dying with advanced dementia in the nursing home and home care settings.
DESIGN
Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING/SUBJECTS: Persons 65 years or older with advanced dementia who died within 1 year of admission to either a nursing home in Michigan between July 1, 1998 until December 31, 2000 (n = 2730), or the state's publicly funded home and community-based services from October 1, 1998 until December 31, 2001 (n = 290).
MEASUREMENTS
Data were derived from the Minimum Data Set (MDS)-Nursing home Version 2.0 for the institutionalized sample, and the MDS-Home Care for the community-based sample. Variables from the MDS assessment completed within 180 days of death were used to describe the end-of-life experiences of these two groups.
RESULTS
Nursing home residents dying with advanced dementia were older, had greater functional impairment, and more behavior problems compared to home care clients. Few subjects in the nursing home (10.3%) and home care (15.6%) cohorts were perceived to have less than 6 months to live. Only 5.7% of nursing home residents and 10.7% home care clients were referred to hospice. Hospitalizations were frequent: nursing home, 43.7%; home care, 31.5%. Pain and shortness of breath were common in both settings. End-of-life variables independently associated with nursing home versus home care included: hospice (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.26, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16-0.43), life expectancy less than 6 months (AOR 0.31; 95% CI, 0.20-0.48), advance directives (AOR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.11-1.96), pain (AOR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.29-0.50), shortness of breath (AOR 0.20; 95% CI (0.13-0.28), and oxygen therapy (AOR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.51-4.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Persons dying with advanced dementia admitted to nursing homes have different characteristics compared to those admitted to home care services. Their end-of-life experiences also differ in these two sites of care. However, palliative care was not optimal in either setting.
背景
许多患有晚期痴呆症的老年人在养老院接受临终护理,另一些人则在社区接受居家护理服务。
目的
描述和比较在养老院和居家护理环境中死于晚期痴呆症患者的临终体验。
设计
回顾性队列研究。
设置/研究对象:1998年7月1日至2000年12月31日期间入住密歇根州某养老院(n = 2730),或1998年10月1日至2001年12月31日期间接受该州公共资助的居家和社区服务(n = 290),且年龄在65岁及以上、患有晚期痴呆症并在入院1年内死亡的患者。
测量
数据来源于机构化样本的《最低数据集》(MDS)-养老院版本2.0,以及社区样本的MDS-居家护理。使用在死亡前180天内完成的MDS评估中的变量来描述这两组患者的临终体验。
结果
与居家护理患者相比,死于晚期痴呆症的养老院居民年龄更大,功能障碍更严重,行为问题更多。养老院队列(10.3%)和居家护理队列(15.6%)中很少有受试者被认为存活时间不足6个月。只有5.7%的养老院居民和10.7%的居家护理患者被转诊至临终关怀机构。住院情况很常见:养老院为43.7%;居家护理为31.5%。疼痛和呼吸急促在两种环境中都很常见。与养老院和居家护理独立相关的临终变量包括:临终关怀(调整后的优势比[AOR] 0.26,95%置信区间[CI],0.16 - 0.43)、预期寿命不足6个月(AOR 0.31;95% CI,0.20 - 0.48)、预先指示(AOR,1.48;95% CI,1.11 - 1.96)、疼痛(AOR,0.38;95% CI,0.29 - 0.50)、呼吸急促(AOR 0.20;95% CI(0.13 - 0.28))以及氧疗(AOR,2.47;95% CI,1.51 - 4.05)。
结论
入住养老院的死于晚期痴呆症的患者与接受居家护理服务的患者具有不同的特征。他们在这两种护理环境中的临终体验也有所不同。然而,在这两种环境中姑息治疗都不是最佳的。