重症监护病房中动脉和中心静脉导管定植以及动脉和中心静脉导管相关菌血症的前瞻性研究。
Prospective study of arterial and central venous catheter colonization and of arterial- and central venous catheter-related bacteremia in intensive care units.
作者信息
Traoré Ousmane, Liotier Jérôme, Souweine Bertrand
机构信息
Service d'Hygiène Hospitalière, Hôpital G. Montpied, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
出版信息
Crit Care Med. 2005 Jun;33(6):1276-80. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000166350.90812.d4.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the rates of positive quantitative culture (PQC) of arterial catheter (AC) and central venous catheter (CVC) tips and of CVC- and AC-related bacteremia in intensive care unit patients undergoing placement of both ACs and CVCs.
DESIGN
Prospective, descriptive survey. To control for a difference in the severity of patients having an AC or CVC, only patients having both an AC and a CVC were included.
SETTING
An adult, nine-bed medical/surgical intensive care unit at a university teaching hospital.
SUBJECTS
The analysis included 308 CVCs and 299 ACs inserted in 212 severely ill patients, with a mean +/- sd Simplified Acute Physiology Score II of 52 +/- 22 and an intensive care unit mortality of 33% (69 of 212).
INTERVENTIONS
None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS
The same insertion and maintenance procedures were used for both types of catheter. A PQC was defined by a catheter tip culture yielding >/=10(3) colony forming units/mL. Catheter-related bacteremia was defined by a PQC and a blood culture positive for the same microorganism. The cumulative incidence (PQCs/number of catheters inserted) was 9.4% (29/308) for CVCs and 7.7% (23/299) for ACs (p = .44). Incidence density (PQCs/1,000 catheter days) was 12.0 for CVCs versus 9.3 for ACs. At the femoral site, there was no significant difference between CVCs and ACs in the cumulative incidences and incidence densities of PQCs. Two instances of catheter-related bacteremia were observed, one involving a CVC and one involving an AC.
CONCLUSIONS
Among severely ill patients with both CVCs and ACs, the epidemiology of PQCs of CVCs and ACs is comparable when the same infection control measures are used for the insertion and maintenance of both types of catheters.
目的
比较在同时放置动脉导管(AC)和中心静脉导管(CVC)的重症监护病房患者中,AC和CVC尖端定量培养阳性(PQC)率以及与CVC和AC相关的菌血症发生率。
设计
前瞻性描述性调查。为控制有AC或CVC患者的病情严重程度差异,仅纳入同时有AC和CVC的患者。
地点
一所大学教学医院的成人九床内科/外科重症监护病房。
研究对象
分析包括插入212例重症患者体内的308根CVC和299根AC,简化急性生理学评分II平均为52±22,重症监护病房死亡率为33%(212例中的69例)。
干预措施
无。
测量指标及主要结果
两种类型导管采用相同的插入和维护程序。PQC定义为导管尖端培养产生≥10³菌落形成单位/毫升。导管相关菌血症定义为PQC且血培养同一微生物阳性。CVC的累积发生率(PQC/插入导管数量)为9.4%(29/308),AC为7.7%(23/299)(p = 0.44)。发病率密度(PQC/1000导管日)CVC为12.0,AC为9.3。在股静脉部位,CVC和AC在PQC的累积发生率和发病率密度方面无显著差异。观察到两例导管相关菌血症,一例涉及CVC,一例涉及AC。
结论
在同时有CVC和AC的重症患者中,当对两种类型导管的插入和维护采用相同的感染控制措施时,CVC和AC的PQC流行病学情况具有可比性。