喉咽反流:评估质子泵抑制剂治疗最佳剂量及治疗前反应预测因素的前瞻性队列研究。

Laryngopharyngeal reflux: prospective cohort study evaluating optimal dose of proton-pump inhibitor therapy and pretherapy predictors of response.

作者信息

Park Woosuk, Hicks Douglas M, Khandwala Farah, Richter Joel E, Abelson Tom I, Milstein Claudio, Vaezi Michael F

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Center for Swallowing and Esophageal Disorders, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2005 Jul;115(7):1230-8. doi: 10.1097/01.MLG.0000163746.81766.45.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is frequently treated with empiric proton-pump inhibitors (PPI), but the optimal dosing and duration is unknown. We performed an open label prospective cohort study to evaluate whether twice-daily (BID) PPI is more effective than once-daily (QD) PPI for the treatment of LPR.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with LPR based on ear, nose, and throat (ENT) symptoms and laryngoscopy findings were enrolled. Questionnaire assessed demographics, ENT symptoms, symptom severity, and exposure to other potential laryngeal irritants. Esophageal manometry, ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring, and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were performed before initiation of therapy. Patients were consecutively assigned to three groups: BID PPI (lansoprazole 30 mg BID), BID PPI + H2 receptor antagonist (H2RA; omeprazole 20 mg BID + ranitidine 300 mg each night), or QD PPI (esomeprazole 40 mg QD). Greater than 50% primary symptom improvement from baseline defined symptom response. At 2 month follow-up, the same PPI dose was continued for responders, and PPIs were doubled for nonresponders for an additional 2 months. Repeat symptom assessment and laryngoscopy performed at 4 month follow-up.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients were enrolled (median age 49 years, interquartile range 44.0 - 65.0; 76% white; 34% male). Treatment groups were BID PPI for 30 patients, BID PPI + H2RA for 30 patients, and QD PPI for 25 patients. RESPONSE TO THERAPY: At 2 months, BID response occurred among 15 of 30 (50%) patients, BID + H2RA for 15 of 30 (50%), and QD for 7 of 25 (28%) (P = .03). No statistical difference found between the two BID PPI groups with and without H2RA. Among the QD group nonresponders, 7 of 13 (54%) achieved symptom response with additional 2 months of BID dosing. At 4 month follow-up, an additional 22% of responses were obtained from the two BID groups (43/60, 72%). The overall response rate for all three groups was 70% (54/77). PREDICTORS OF OUTCOME: Pretherapy interarytenoid mucosa and true vocal folds abnormalities were associated with twofold increase in symptom response (odds ratio 1.99 and 1.96, respectively, P = .017).

CONCLUSION

BID PPI appears to be more effective than QD PPI in achieving clinical symptom response in suspected LPR. More response was achieved at 4 months compared with 2 months. Therefore, aggressive acid suppression with BID PPI for at least 4 months is warranted for treatment of LPR.

摘要

目的

喉咽反流(LPR)通常采用经验性质子泵抑制剂(PPI)治疗,但最佳剂量和疗程尚不清楚。我们进行了一项开放标签前瞻性队列研究,以评估每日两次(BID)PPI治疗LPR是否比每日一次(QD)PPI更有效。

方法

纳入根据耳鼻喉(ENT)症状和喉镜检查结果诊断为LPR的患者。通过问卷评估人口统计学、耳鼻喉症状、症状严重程度以及接触其他潜在喉部刺激物的情况。在开始治疗前进行食管测压、动态24小时pH监测和上消化道内镜检查。患者被连续分为三组:每日两次PPI(兰索拉唑30 mg,每日两次)、每日两次PPI + H2受体拮抗剂(H2RA;奥美拉唑20 mg,每日两次 + 雷尼替丁300 mg每晚)或每日一次PPI(埃索美拉唑40 mg,每日一次)。主要症状较基线改善超过50%定义为症状缓解。在2个月随访时,有反应者继续使用相同剂量的PPI,无反应者将PPI剂量加倍再治疗2个月。在4个月随访时重复症状评估和喉镜检查。

结果

共纳入85例患者(中位年龄49岁,四分位间距44.0 - 65.0;76%为白人;34%为男性)。治疗组分别为每日两次PPI组30例、每日两次PPI + H2RA组30例、每日一次PPI组25例。治疗反应:2个月时,每日两次PPI组30例中有15例(50%)有反应,每日两次PPI + H2RA组30例中有15例(50%)有反应,每日一次PPI组25例中有7例(28%)有反应(P = .03)。每日两次PPI加与不加H2RA的两组之间未发现统计学差异。在每日一次PPI组的无反应者中,13例中有7例(54%)在额外2个月的每日两次给药后达到症状缓解。在4个月随访时,两个每日两次给药组又有22%(43/60,72%)出现反应。三组的总体反应率为70%(54/77)。结果预测因素:治疗前杓间区黏膜和真声带异常与症状缓解增加两倍相关(优势比分别为1.99和1.96,P = .017)。

结论

在疑似LPR患者中,每日两次PPI在实现临床症状缓解方面似乎比每日一次PPI更有效。4个月时比2个月时有更多反应。因此,对于LPR的治疗,采用每日两次PPI进行积极的抑酸治疗至少4个月是必要的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索