Heiss G E, Berman W H, Sperling M B
Fordham University, Bronx, NY 10458, USA.
J Pers Assess. 1996 Aug;67(1):102-15. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6701_8.
The multitude of measures and differences across self-report indices of continued parental attachment raise questions regarding the validity and meaning of these scales. The purpose of this study was to examine the convergent and construct validity of 5 measures of continued parental attachment. Five attachment scales and 6 personality scales were administered to 216 undergraduate students. Factor analyses and correlational analyses indicate that the 5 attachment measures differentiate healthy from pathological bonding with parents, the construct being assessed has multiple dimensions, and scores on these attachment measures are correlated with personify variables as would be expected. These attachment scales appear to assess a construct that is related to attachment, although they may be more illustrative of the general affective quality of relationships. Subsequent assessment efforts should employ more specific ratings and measure concrete behavioral manifestations of attachment to most effectively examine the construct.
在持续的父母依恋的自我报告指标中，众多的测量方法和差异引发了关于这些量表的有效性和意义的问题。本研究的目的是检验5种持续父母依恋测量方法的收敛效度和结构效度。对216名本科生施测了5种依恋量表和6种人格量表。因素分析和相关分析表明，这5种依恋测量方法能够区分与父母的健康依恋和病态依恋，所评估的结构具有多个维度，并且这些依恋测量方法的得分与预期的人格变量相关。这些依恋量表似乎评估了一个与依恋相关的结构，尽管它们可能更能说明人际关系的一般情感质量。后续的评估工作应采用更具体的评分方法，并测量依恋的具体行为表现，以便最有效地检验该结构。
