颈椎椎体次全切除术中体感诱发电位监测:508例经验
Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during cervical spine corpectomy surgery: experience with 508 cases.
作者信息
Khan Mustafa H, Smith Patrick N, Balzer Jeffrey R, Crammond Donald, Welch William C, Gerszten Peter, Sclabassi Robert J, Kang James D, Donaldson William F
机构信息
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
出版信息
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Feb 15;31(4):E105-13. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000200163.71909.1f.
STUDY DESIGN
Retrospective review.
OBJECTIVES
To review consecutive cases of cervical spine corpectomy surgery performed with intraoperative somatosensory-evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA
There is controversy about the utility of SSEP monitoring during anterior cervical spine surgery. There is no study in the literature that has specifically evaluated the utility of SSEP monitoring for cervical spine corpectomy surgery.
METHODS
Intraoperative SSEP tracings for 508 patients (average age, 55.7 years; 268 male, 240 female) who underwent anterior cervical fusion with single-level or multilevel corpectomies were reviewed. Intraoperative and postoperative records were analyzed to determine if any new neurologic deficits developed when the patients woke up from anesthesia.
RESULTS
The overall incidence of a new postoperative neurologic deficit in this series of patients was 2.4% (11 with nerve root injury, 1 with quadriplegia). The incidence of significant SSEP changes was 5.3% (27 of 508 patients). The most common identifiable cause of SSEP changes was hypotension, and the most common neurologic deficit was deltoid (C5) weakness. One patient had irreversible SSEP changes, and he woke up with new-onset quadriplegia. The calculated sensitivity and specificity of intraoperative SSEP monitoring for detecting impending or resultant intraoperative iatrogenic neurologic injury were 77.1% and 100%, respectively. However, if the isolated nerve root injuries are removed from the analysis, then both the calculated sensitivity and the negative predictive values were 100%.
CONCLUSIONS
Intraoperative SSEP monitoring can alert the surgeon to adverse iatrogenic intraoperative events with potential for neurologic injury. Most SSEP signal changes are reversible and do not result in a clinical deficit. Isolated nerve root injury appears to be the most common iatrogenic intraoperative injury during cervical spine corpectomy surgery.
研究设计
回顾性研究。
目的
回顾连续进行术中体感诱发电位(SSEP)监测的颈椎椎体次全切除术病例。
背景资料总结
颈椎前路手术中SSEP监测的效用存在争议。文献中尚无专门评估SSEP监测在颈椎椎体次全切除术中效用的研究。
方法
回顾了508例(平均年龄55.7岁;男性268例,女性240例)接受单节段或多节段椎体次全切除前路颈椎融合术患者的术中SSEP描记图。分析术中及术后记录,以确定患者从麻醉中苏醒时是否出现任何新的神经功能缺损。
结果
该系列患者术后新出现神经功能缺损的总体发生率为2.4%(11例神经根损伤,1例四肢瘫)。SSEP显著变化的发生率为5.3%(508例患者中的27例)。SSEP变化最常见的可识别原因是低血压,最常见的神经功能缺损是三角肌(C5)无力。1例患者出现不可逆的SSEP变化,苏醒时出现新发四肢瘫。术中SSEP监测检测即将发生或已发生的术中医源性神经损伤的计算敏感性和特异性分别为77.1%和100%。然而,如果在分析中排除孤立的神经根损伤,那么计算出的敏感性和阴性预测值均为100%。
结论
术中SSEP监测可提醒外科医生注意可能导致神经损伤的术中不良医源性事件。大多数SSEP信号变化是可逆的,不会导致临床缺损。孤立的神经根损伤似乎是颈椎椎体次全切除术最常见的术中医源性损伤。