物质使用障碍治疗的应急管理:一项荟萃分析。
Contingency management for treatment of substance use disorders: a meta-analysis.
作者信息
Prendergast Michael, Podus Deborah, Finney John, Greenwell Lisa, Roll John
机构信息
Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
出版信息
Addiction. 2006 Nov;101(11):1546-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01581.x.
AIMS
To examine the effectiveness of contingency management (CM) techniques in treating substance use disorders (i.e. illicit drugs, alcohol, tobacco).
DESIGN
Meta-analysis was used to determine the average effect size and potential moderators in 47 comparisons of the effectiveness of CM from studies based on a treatment-control group design and published between 1970 and 2002.
FINDINGS
The mean effect size (ES) of CM was positive, with a magnitude of d = 0.42 using a fixed effects model. The magnitude of the ES declined over time, following treatment. CM was more effective in treating opiate use (d = 0.65) and cocaine use (d = 0.66), compared with tobacco (d = 0.31) or multiple drugs (d = 0.42). Larger effect sizes were associated with higher researcher involvement, earlier studies and shorter treatment duration.
CONCLUSIONS
Study findings suggest that CM is among the more effective approaches to promoting abstinence during the treatment of substance use disorders. CM improves the ability of clients to remain abstinent, thereby allowing them to take fuller advantage of other clinical treatment components.
目的
探讨应急管理(CM)技术在治疗物质使用障碍(即非法药物、酒精、烟草)方面的有效性。
设计
采用荟萃分析来确定基于治疗对照组设计且在1970年至2002年间发表的研究中,47项关于CM有效性比较的平均效应量及潜在调节因素。
研究结果
使用固定效应模型时,CM的平均效应量(ES)为阳性,大小为d = 0.42。治疗后,ES的大小随时间下降。与烟草(d = 0.31)或多种药物(d = 0.42)相比,CM在治疗阿片类药物使用(d = 0.65)和可卡因使用(d = 0.66)方面更有效。较大的效应量与更高的研究者参与度、早期研究以及更短的治疗持续时间相关。
结论
研究结果表明,CM是在物质使用障碍治疗期间促进戒断的更有效方法之一。CM提高了服务对象保持戒断的能力,从而使他们能够更充分地利用其他临床治疗要素。