Graff Maud J L, Vernooij-Dassen Myrra J M, Thijssen Marjolein, Dekker Joost, Hoefnagels Willibrord H L, Rikkert Marcel G M Olde
Research Group for Allied Health Care, Department of Allied Health Care Disciplines, Occupational Therapy, University Medical Center Nijmegen, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands.
BMJ. 2006 Dec 9;333(7580):1196. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39001.688843.BE. Epub 2006 Nov 17.
To determine the effectiveness of community based occupational therapy on daily functioning of patients with dementia and the sense of competence of their care givers.
Single blind randomised controlled trial. Assessors were blinded for treatment allocation.
Memory clinic and day clinic of a geriatrics department and participants' homes.
135 patients aged > or =65 with mild to moderate dementia living in the community and their primary care givers.
10 sessions of occupational therapy over five weeks, including cognitive and behavioural interventions, to train patients in the use of aids to compensate for cognitive decline and care givers in coping behaviours and supervision.
Patients' daily functioning assessed with the assessment of motor and process skills (AMPS) and the performance scale of the interview of deterioration in daily activities in dementia (IDDD). Care giver burden assessed with the sense of competence questionnaire (SCQ). Participants were evaluated at baseline, six weeks, and three months.
Scores improved significantly relative to baseline in patients and care givers in the intervention group compared with the controls (differences were 1.5 (95% confidence interval 1.3 to 1.7) for the process scale; -11.7 (-13.6 to -9.7) for the performance scale; and (11.0; 9.2 to 12.8) for the competence scale). This improvement was still significant at three months. The number needed to treat to reach a clinically relevant improvement in motor and process skills score was 1.3 (1.2 to 1.4) at six weeks. Effect sizes were 2.5, 2.3, and 1.2, respectively, at six weeks and 2.7, 2.4, and 0.8, respectively, at 12 weeks.
Occupational therapy improved patients' daily functioning and reduced the burden on the care giver, despite the patients' limited learning ability. Effects were still present at 12 weeks, which justifies implementation of this intervention.
Clinical Trials NCT00295152 [ClinicalTrials.gov].
确定基于社区的职业治疗对痴呆患者日常功能及照护者胜任感的效果。
单盲随机对照试验。评估者对治疗分配情况不知情。
老年病科的记忆门诊和日间门诊以及参与者家中。
135名年龄≥65岁、患有轻度至中度痴呆且居住在社区的患者及其主要照护者。
在五周内进行10次职业治疗,包括认知和行为干预,以训练患者使用辅助工具来弥补认知衰退,并训练照护者的应对行为和监督能力。
使用运动和过程技能评估(AMPS)以及痴呆日常活动恶化访谈表现量表(IDDD)评估患者的日常功能。使用胜任感问卷(SCQ)评估照护者负担。在基线、六周和三个月时对参与者进行评估。
与对照组相比,干预组患者和照护者的得分相对于基线有显著改善(过程量表差异为1.5(95%置信区间1.3至1.7);表现量表差异为-11.7(-13.6至-9.7);胜任感量表差异为11.0(9.2至12.8))。三个月时这种改善仍然显著。在六周时,运动和过程技能得分达到临床相关改善所需的治疗人数为1.3(1.2至1.4)。六周时效应量分别为2.5、2.3和1.2,12周时分别为2.7、2.4和0.8。
尽管患者学习能力有限,但职业治疗改善了患者的日常功能并减轻了照护者的负担。12周时仍有效果,这证明了实施该干预措施的合理性。
临床试验NCT00295152 [ClinicalTrials.gov]