钝性严重创伤患者的急诊室管理:以城市创伤中心为例对多层螺旋计算机断层扫描方案的评估
Emergency room management of patients with blunt major trauma: evaluation of the multislice computed tomography protocol exemplified by an urban trauma center.
作者信息
Weninger Patrick, Mauritz Walter, Fridrich Peter, Spitaler Ralf, Figl Markus, Kern Bernhardt, Hertz Harald
机构信息
Department of Trauma Surgery, Trauma Hospital Lorenz Boehler, Austria.
出版信息
J Trauma. 2007 Mar;62(3):584-91. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000221797.46249.ee.
BACKGROUND
The early clinical management of patients with major trauma still represents a challenge. To clinically evaluate the full extent of a patient's injuries is difficult, especially when the patient is unconscious. Before December 2002, trauma patients admitted to our emergency room (ER) underwent a diagnostic protocol including physical examination, conventional radiography (CR), sonography and further procedures if necessary. After the installation of a MSCT scanner, all trauma patients underwent the "MSCT protocol" immediately after admission. The aim of the study was to compare the "MSCT-protocol" as it is performed at our institution, with the "Pre-MSCT-protocol".
METHODS
We compared 185 patients undergoing the "Pre MSCT-protocol" with 185 patients undergoing "MSCT protocol". We evaluated the efficacy, speed and accuracy of the "MSCT protocol" using several variables. Time periods from admission to the ER to admission to the intensive care unit were compared as well as outcome parameters such as length of ICU stay, ventilation period and rates of organ. Dichotomous data were analyzed by Chi-square analysis; continuous data were analyzed by Student's t test. Any values of p < 0.05 were considered significant for any test.
RESULTS
No significant differences were found regarding demographic data. The full extent of injuries was definitively diagnosed after 12 +/- 9 minutes in 92.4% of the "MSCT protocol" cohort. In only 76.2% of "Pre-MSCT protocol" cohort definitive diagnosis was possible after 41 +/- 27 minutes. Total ER time was 104 +/- 21 minutes with the "Pre-MSCT protocol" and 70 +/- 17 minutes with "MSCT protocol" (p < 0.05). "Pre-MSCT protocol" patients had a significantly longer ICU stay than "MSCT protocol" patients (p < 0.05). "MSCT protocol" patients had significantly fewer ventilation days (14.3 vs. 10.9 days). Furthermore, rates of organ failure were lower in patients undergoing the "MSCT protocol".
CONCLUSION
We could demonstrate that immediate MSCT in patients with blunt major trauma leads to more accurate and faster diagnosis, and reduction of early clinical time intervals. We also observed a reduction in ventilation, ICU, and hospital days, and in organ failure rates, though this might have been partly due to small differences in case mix. The "MSCT protocol" algorithm seems to be safe and effective.
背景
严重创伤患者的早期临床管理仍然是一项挑战。临床上要全面评估患者的损伤程度很困难,尤其是当患者昏迷时。2002年12月之前,入住我们急诊室(ER)的创伤患者接受包括体格检查、传统X线摄影(CR)、超声检查以及必要时的进一步检查在内的诊断方案。在安装多层螺旋CT(MSCT)扫描仪后,所有创伤患者入院后立即接受“MSCT方案”。本研究的目的是将我们机构实施的“MSCT方案”与“MSCT前方案”进行比较。
方法
我们将185例接受“MSCT前方案”的患者与185例接受“MSCT方案”的患者进行比较。我们使用多个变量评估“MSCT方案”的有效性、速度和准确性。比较了从进入急诊室到入住重症监护病房的时间段以及诸如重症监护病房住院时间、通气时间和器官衰竭发生率等结果参数。二分数据采用卡方分析;连续数据采用学生t检验。任何检验中p < 0.05的值均被视为具有显著性。
结果
在人口统计学数据方面未发现显著差异。在“MSCT方案”队列中,92.4%的患者在12±9分钟后明确诊断出全部损伤程度。在“MSCT前方案”队列中,只有76.2%的患者在41±27分钟后能够明确诊断。“MSCT前方案”的总急诊时间为104±21分钟,“MSCT方案”为70±17分钟(p < 0.05)。“MSCT前方案”患者的重症监护病房住院时间明显长于“MSCT方案”患者(p < 0.05)。“MSCT方案”患者的通气天数明显更少(14.3天对10.9天)。此外,接受“MSCT方案”的患者器官衰竭发生率更低。
结论
我们可以证明,对钝性严重创伤患者立即进行MSCT检查可实现更准确、更快速的诊断,并缩短早期临床时间间隔。我们还观察到通气、重症监护病房和住院天数以及器官衰竭发生率均有所降低,不过这可能部分归因于病例组合的细微差异。“MSCT方案”算法似乎是安全有效的。