基于呼出一氧化氮与临床症状的针对儿童和成人哮喘的个性化干预措施。

Tailored interventions based on exhaled nitric oxide versus clinical symptoms for asthma in children and adults.

作者信息

Petsky H L, Cates C J, Li A M, Kynaston J A, Turner C, Chang A B

机构信息

Royal Children's Hospital, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Herston Road, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 4029.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16(2):CD006340. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006340.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The measurement of severity and control of asthma in both children and adults can be based on subjective or objective measures. It has been advocated that fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) can be used to monitor airway inflammation as it correlates with some markers of asthma. Interventions for asthma therapies have been traditionally based on symptoms and/or spirometry.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of tailoring asthma interventions based on exhaled nitric oxide in comparison to clinical symptoms (with or without spirometry/peak flow) for asthma related outcomes in children and adults.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register of Trials, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and reference lists of articles. The last search was completed in December 2006.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled comparisons of adjustment of asthma therapy based on exhaled nitric oxide compared to traditional methods (primarily clinical symptoms and spirometry/peak flow).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Results of searches were reviewed against pre-determined criteria for inclusion. Relevant studies were independently selected in duplicate. Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Authors were contacted for further information but none were received. Data was analysed as "intervention received" and sensitivity analyses performed.

MAIN RESULTS

Four (2 adult and 2 paediatric) studies were included; these studies differed in a variety of ways including definition of asthma exacerbations, FeNO cut off levels and duration of study. Of 356 participants randomised, 324 completed the trials. In the meta-analysis, there was no difference between groups for the primary outcome of asthma exacerbations or for other outcomes (clinical symptoms, FeNO level and spirometry). In post-hoc analysis, a significant reduction in mean final daily dose inhaled corticosteroid per adult was found in the group where treatment was based on FeNO in comparison to clinical symptoms; WMD -282.46 (95% CI -422.08 to -142.84). There was no difference in ICS dose between the groups in the overall daily dose in the adult studies or in the paediatric studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Tailoring the dose of inhaled corticosteroids based on exhaled nitric oxide in comparison to clinical symptoms was carried out in different ways in the four studies that were found, and the results show only modest differences. The role of utilising exhaled nitric oxide to tailor the dose of inhaled corticosteroids is currently uncertain.

摘要

背景

儿童和成人哮喘严重程度及控制情况的测量可基于主观或客观指标。有人主张,呼出一氧化氮分数(FeNO)可用于监测气道炎症,因为它与哮喘的一些标志物相关。传统上,哮喘治疗的干预措施基于症状和/或肺功能测定。

目的

评估与基于临床症状(有或无肺功能测定/呼气峰值流速)相比,根据呼出一氧化氮调整哮喘干预措施对儿童和成人哮喘相关结局的疗效。

检索策略

我们检索了Cochrane气道组专业试验注册库、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE、EMBASE以及文章的参考文献列表。最后一次检索于2006年12月完成。

选择标准

所有基于呼出一氧化氮调整哮喘治疗与传统方法(主要是临床症状和肺功能测定/呼气峰值流速)的随机对照比较。

数据收集与分析

根据预先确定的纳入标准对检索结果进行审查。相关研究由两人独立重复选择。两位作者独立评估试验质量并提取数据。已联系作者获取更多信息,但未收到回复。数据按“接受的干预措施”进行分析并进行敏感性分析。

主要结果

纳入了四项研究(两项成人研究和两项儿科研究);这些研究在多种方面存在差异,包括哮喘加重的定义、FeNO临界值水平和研究持续时间。在356名随机分组的参与者中,324人完成了试验。在荟萃分析中,哮喘加重的主要结局或其他结局(临床症状、FeNO水平和肺功能测定)在两组之间没有差异。在事后分析中,与基于临床症状的组相比,基于FeNO进行治疗的组中成年患者吸入糖皮质激素的平均最终每日剂量显著降低;加权均数差为-282.46(95%可信区间为-422.08至-142.84)。在成年研究或儿科研究的总体每日剂量中,两组之间的吸入糖皮质激素剂量没有差异。

作者结论

在找到的四项研究中,与基于临床症状相比,根据呼出一氧化氮调整吸入糖皮质激素剂量的方式各不相同,结果仅显示出适度差异。利用呼出一氧化氮调整吸入糖皮质激素剂量的作用目前尚不确定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索