社区药房的实践变革:促进因素的量化
Practice change in community pharmacy: quantification of facilitators.
作者信息
Roberts Alison S, Benrimoj Shalom I, Chen Timothy F, Williams Kylie A, Aslani Parisa
机构信息
The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
出版信息
Ann Pharmacother. 2008 Jun;42(6):861-8. doi: 10.1345/aph.1K617. Epub 2008 May 13.
BACKGROUND
There has been an increasing international trend toward the delivery of cognitive pharmaceutical services (CPS) in community pharmacy. CPS have been developed and disseminated individually, without a framework underpinning their implementation and with limited knowledge of factors that might assist practice change. The implementation process is complex, involving a range of internal and external factors.
OBJECTIVE
To quantify facilitators of practice change in Australian community pharmacies.
METHODS
We employed a literature review and qualitative study to facilitate the design of a 43-item "facilitators of practice change" scale as part of a quantitative survey instrument, using a framework of organizational theory. The questionnaire was pilot-tested (n = 100), then mailed to a random sample of 2000 community pharmacies, with a copy each for the pharmacy owner, employed pharmacist, and pharmacy assistant. The construct validity and reliability of the scale were established using exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha, respectively.
RESULTS
A total of 735 (37%) pharmacies responded, with 1303 individual questionnaires. Factor analysis of the scale yielded 7 factors, explaining 48.8% of the total variance. The factors were: relationship with physicians (item loading range 0.59-0.85; Cronbach's alpha 0.90), remuneration (0.52-0.74; 0.82), pharmacy layout (0.52-0.79; 0.81), patient expectation (0.52-0.85; 0.82), manpower/staff (0.49-0.66; 0.80), communication and teamwork (0.37-0.65; 0.77), and external support/assistance (0.47-0.69; 0.74).
CONCLUSIONS
All of the factors demonstrated good reliability and construct validity and explained approximately half of the variance. Implementing CPS requires support not only with the clinical aspects of service delivery, but also for the process of implementation itself, and remuneration models must reflect this. The identified facilitators should be used in a multilevel strategy to integrate professional services into the community pharmacy business, engaging pharmacists and their staff, policy makers, educators, and researchers. Further research is required to determine additional factors impacting the capacity of community pharmacies to implement change.
背景
在社区药房提供认知药学服务(CPS)的国际趋势日益增强。CPS是单独开发和传播的,缺乏支持其实施的框架,且对可能有助于实践变革的因素了解有限。实施过程很复杂,涉及一系列内部和外部因素。
目的
量化澳大利亚社区药房实践变革的促进因素。
方法
我们采用文献综述和定性研究,以促进设计一份包含43个条目的“实践变革促进因素”量表,作为定量调查工具的一部分,使用组织理论框架。该问卷进行了预测试(n = 100),然后邮寄给2000家社区药房的随机样本,给药房所有者、在职药剂师和药房助理各一份。分别使用探索性因素分析和克朗巴哈系数来确定该量表的结构效度和信度。
结果
共有735家(37%)药房回复,共收到1303份个人问卷。该量表的因素分析产生了7个因素,解释了总方差的48.8%。这些因素是:与医生的关系(条目载荷范围0.59 - 0.85;克朗巴哈系数0.90)、薪酬(0.52 - 0.74;0.82)、药房布局(0.52 - 0.79;0.81)、患者期望(0.52 - 0.85;0.82)、人力/员工(0.49 - 0.66;0.80)、沟通与团队合作(0.37 - 0.65;0.77)以及外部支持/援助(0.47 - 0.69;0.74)。
结论
所有因素都显示出良好的信度和结构效度,并解释了约一半的方差。实施CPS不仅需要在服务提供的临床方面提供支持,还需要为实施过程本身提供支持,薪酬模式必须反映这一点。所确定的促进因素应在多层次策略中使用,以将专业服务整合到社区药房业务中,让药剂师及其员工、政策制定者、教育工作者和研究人员参与进来。需要进一步研究以确定影响社区药房实施变革能力的其他因素。