极低频电场和磁场职业流行病学的未来需求:综述与建议
Future needs of occupational epidemiology of extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields: review and recommendations.
作者信息
Kheifets L, Bowman J D, Checkoway H, Feychting M, Harrington J M, Kavet R, Marsh G, Mezei G, Renew D C, van Wijngaarden E
机构信息
UCLA School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, 73-284 CHS, 650 Charles E Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1772, USA.
出版信息
Occup Environ Med. 2009 Feb;66(2):72-80. doi: 10.1136/oem.2007.037994. Epub 2008 Sep 19.
The occupational epidemiological literature on extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields (EMF) and health encompasses a large number of studies of varying design and quality that have addressed many health outcomes, including various cancers, cardiovascular disease, depression and suicide, and neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). At a 2006 workshop we reviewed studies of occupational EMF exposure with an emphasis on methodological weaknesses, and proposed analytical ways to address some of these. We also developed research priorities that we hope will address remaining uncertainties. Broadly speaking, extensive epidemiological research conducted during the past 20 years on occupational EMF exposure does not indicate strong or consistent associations with cancer or any other health outcomes. Inconsistent results for many of the outcomes may be attributable to numerous shortcomings in the studies, most notably in exposure assessment. There is, however, no obvious correlation between exposure assessment quality and observed associations. Nevertheless, for future research, the highest priorities emerge in both the areas of exposure assessment and investigation of ALS. To better assess exposure, we call for the development of a more complete job-exposure matrix that combines job title, work environment and task, and an index of exposure to electric fields, magnetic fields, spark discharge, contact current, and other chemical and physical agents. For ALS, we propose an international collaborative study capable of illuminating a reported association with electrical occupations by disentangling the potential roles of electric shocks, magnetic fields and bias. Such a study will potentially lead to evidence-based measures to protect public health.
关于极低频电场和磁场(EMF)与健康的职业流行病学文献包含大量设计和质量各异的研究,这些研究涉及多种健康结局,包括各种癌症、心血管疾病、抑郁症和自杀,以及神经退行性疾病,如阿尔茨海默病和肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)。在2006年的一次研讨会上,我们回顾了职业EMF暴露的研究,重点关注方法学上的弱点,并提出了一些解决这些问题的分析方法。我们还制定了研究重点,希望能解决剩余的不确定性。广义而言,过去20年对职业EMF暴露进行的广泛流行病学研究并未表明其与癌症或任何其他健康结局存在强烈或一致的关联。许多结局的结果不一致可能归因于研究中的众多缺陷,最明显的是暴露评估方面的缺陷。然而,暴露评估质量与观察到的关联之间没有明显的相关性。尽管如此,对于未来的研究,暴露评估和ALS调查这两个领域的优先级最高。为了更好地评估暴露情况,我们呼吁开发一个更完整的工作暴露矩阵,该矩阵结合了工作头衔、工作环境和任务,以及电场、磁场、火花放电、接触电流和其他化学和物理因素的暴露指数。对于ALS,我们提议开展一项国际合作研究,通过厘清电击、磁场和偏倚的潜在作用,阐明其与电气职业的报道关联。这样的研究可能会带来基于证据的公共卫生保护措施。