Thompson G Brian, Connelly Vincent, Fletcher-Flinn Claire M, Hodson Sheryl J
Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Mem Cognit. 2009 Mar;37(2):223-34. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.2.223.
Does the type of reading instruction experienced during the initial years at school have any continuing effect on the ways in which adults read words? The question has arisen in current discussions about computational models of mature word-reading processes. We tested predicted continuing effects by comparing matched samples of skilled adult readers of English who had received explicit phonics instruction in childhood and those who had not. In responding to nonwords that can receive alternative legitimate pronunciations, those adults having childhood phonics instruction used more regular grapheme-phoneme correspondences that were context free and used fewer vocabulary-based contextually dependent correspondences than did adults who had no phonics instruction. These differences in regularization of naming responses also extended to some low-frequency words. This apparent cognitive footprint of childhood phonics instruction is a phenomenon requiring consideration when researchers attempt to model adult word reading and when they select participants to test the models.
在学校最初几年所经历的阅读教学类型,对成年人阅读单词的方式是否有持续影响?这个问题在当前关于成熟单词阅读过程计算模型的讨论中出现了。我们通过比较童年时期接受过明确拼读教学的熟练成年英语读者与未接受过此类教学的读者的匹配样本,来测试预测的持续影响。在对可以有其他合法发音的非单词做出反应时,那些童年接受过拼读教学的成年人使用更多无上下文的常规字素 - 音素对应关系,并且比未接受过拼读教学的成年人使用更少基于词汇的上下文相关对应关系。命名反应的这种规范化差异也延伸到了一些低频单词。童年拼读教学这种明显的认知印记,是研究人员在尝试为成人单词阅读建模以及选择参与者来测试模型时需要考虑的一种现象。