肺静脉隔离在持续性心房颤动消融中的作用:持续性心房颤动肺静脉隔离(PIPA)研究

Role of pulmonary veins isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation ablation: the pulmonary vein isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation (PIPA) study.

作者信息

Stabile Giuseppe, Bertaglia Emanuele, Turco Pietro, Zoppo Franco, Iuliano Assunta, Zerbo Francesca, La Rocca Vincenzo, De Simone Antonio

机构信息

Clinica Mediterranea, Naples, Italy.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009 Mar;32 Suppl 1:S116-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.02265.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The role of pulmonary veins (PV) isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is still debated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the adjunctive role of PV isolation in patients with persistent AF who underwent circumferential PV ablation (anatomical approach).

METHODS

We treated 97 consecutive patients presenting with drug-refractory persistent AF by an anatomical approach (group A, n = 36, mean age = 60 +/- 8 years, 29 males) or an integrated approach (group B, n = 61, mean age 59 +/- 10 years, 48 males). In all patients, radiofrequency (RF) ablation was performed by means of a nonfluoroscopic navigation system, in order to anatomically create circumferential lines around the PV. In group B, the persistence of PV potentials was ascertained with a multipolar circular catheter. If PV potentials persisted, RF energy targeting the electrophysiological breakthroughs was delivered to disconnect the PV. Past a 2-month period of observation, success was defined as absence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence lasting >30 seconds.

RESULTS

Total procedure duration (220 +/- 62 minutes vs 140 +/- 43 minutes, P < 0.001), fluoroscopy time (35 +/- 15 minutes vs 17 +/- 9 minutes, P < 0.001), and RF delivery time (48 +/- 22 minutes vs 27 +/- 9 minutes, P < 0.001) were significantly longer in group B than in group A. One cardiac perforation occurred in group A. After 15 +/- 9.1 months, 21 patients in group A (58%) and 34 patients in group B (56%) were free of atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence (P = 0.9).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with persistent AF, who underwent an anatomical approach, electrophysiological confirmation of PV disconnection significantly increased the fluoroscopy and procedural times, without effect on the long-term outcomes.

摘要

背景

肺静脉(PV)隔离在持续性心房颤动(AF)患者中的作用仍存在争议。本研究的目的是评估PV隔离在接受环肺静脉消融(解剖学方法)的持续性AF患者中的辅助作用。

方法

我们采用解剖学方法(A组,n = 36,平均年龄 = 60±8岁,男性29例)或综合方法(B组,n = 61,平均年龄59±10岁,男性48例)治疗了97例连续的药物难治性持续性AF患者。在所有患者中,使用非荧光透视导航系统进行射频(RF)消融,以便在PV周围解剖学地创建环线。在B组中,使用多极环形导管确定PV电位的持续性。如果PV电位持续存在,则将针对电生理突破点的RF能量传递以断开PV。经过2个月的观察期后,成功定义为无任何持续时间>30秒的房性快速性心律失常复发。

结果

B组的总手术时间(220±62分钟对140±43分钟,P < 0.001)、透视时间(35±15分钟对17±9分钟,P < 0.001)和RF释放时间(48±22分钟对27±9分钟,P < 0.001)均显著长于A组。A组发生1例心脏穿孔。在15±9.1个月后,A组21例患者(58%)和B组34例患者(56%)无房性快速性心律失常复发(P = 0.9)。

结论

在接受解剖学方法治疗的持续性AF患者中,PV断开的电生理确认显著增加了透视和手术时间,但对长期结果无影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索