在一个基于人群的、患有潜在可治愈前列腺癌的男性队列中,肿瘤分级、治疗和相对存活率。
Tumour grade, treatment, and relative survival in a population-based cohort of men with potentially curable prostate cancer.
机构信息
Department of Urology, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
出版信息
Eur Urol. 2010 Apr;57(4):631-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.007. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
BACKGROUND
There is insufficient information regarding the benefit of treatment with curative intent for men with localised poorly differentiated prostate cancer (PCa).
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate relative survival in men with potentially curable PCa in relation to Gleason score (GS) and treatment as practiced in the community at large.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A population-based study including all men with localised PCa registered in Sweden's National Prostate Cancer Register.
INTERVENTIONS
Hormonal therapy, watchful waiting, and treatment with curative intent.
MEASUREMENTS
The ratio of observed deaths to expected deaths, determined from survival in the general male population of the same age, was assessed using Poisson regression analysis, with GS and treatment as covariates. Interaction between GS and treatment was tested in a multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS
A total of 31,903 men with potentially curable tumour (T1-T3, N0/NX, M0/MX, age <75 yr, and prostate-specific antigen [PSA] <20 ng/ml) were identified. GS was recorded for 28,454 of these men. Some 19,606 men (60.8%) were treated with curative intent, and 12,645 men (39.2%) were given either hormonal treatment or expectant management. The ratios between observed and expected survival gradually increased for men with GS 10, with GS to 3.3 for men treated conservatively and to 1.4 for men treated with curative intent. There was a significant interaction between GS and treatment, with a relatively greater benefit from treatment with curative intent for men with high-grade tumours. The results have to be interpreted with some caution, as there was no randomisation between the treatment groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Survival for men with well-differentiated tumours is close to that of the general population, regardless of treatment, but the outcome is dismal for men with poorly differentiated tumours, whichever treatment is applied. Nevertheless, men with poorly differentiated tumours benefit more from curative treatment than do men with well- differentiated tumours.
背景
对于局限性低分化前列腺癌(PCa)患者,根治性治疗的获益信息有限。
目的
评估社区内广泛应用的治疗方法与可治愈性对局限性 PCa 患者相对生存率的影响,与 Gleason 评分(GS)相关。
设计、设置和参与者:本研究为基于人群的研究,纳入了瑞典全国前列腺癌登记处登记的所有局限性 PCa 男性患者。
干预措施
激素治疗、观察等待和根治性治疗。
测量方法
使用泊松回归分析评估观察到的死亡人数与预期死亡人数的比例,通过同年龄普通男性人群的生存率确定,GS 和治疗为协变量。在多变量 Cox 比例风险分析中检验 GS 和治疗之间的交互作用。
结果和局限性
共确定了 31903 例潜在可治愈肿瘤(T1-T3、N0/NX、M0/MX、年龄<75 岁、前列腺特异性抗原[PSA] <20ng/ml)的患者。其中 28454 例患者记录了 GS。19606 例(60.8%)患者接受了根治性治疗,12645 例(39.2%)患者接受了激素治疗或观察等待。GS 为 10 分的患者,观察到的与预期的生存率之比逐渐增加,保守治疗为 3.3,根治性治疗为 1.4。GS 和治疗之间存在显著的交互作用,高分级肿瘤患者从根治性治疗中获益更大。由于治疗组之间没有随机分组,因此结果需要谨慎解释。
结论
无论治疗方法如何,分化良好的肿瘤患者的生存率接近普通人群,但分化较差的肿瘤患者的预后较差,无论采用何种治疗方法。然而,与分化良好的肿瘤患者相比,分化较差的肿瘤患者从根治性治疗中获益更多。