为期 1 天的帕洛诺司琼联合地塞米松与或不联合地塞米松在第 2 天和第 3 天用于预防中度致吐性化疗引起的恶心和呕吐的双盲、随机、对照研究:疗效和耐受性。
Double-blind, randomised, controlled study of the efficacy and tolerability of palonosetron plus dexamethasone for 1 day with or without dexamethasone on days 2 and 3 in the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.
机构信息
Division of Oncology, Institut Multidisciplinaire d'Oncologie, Clinique de Genolier, Genolier, Switzerland.
出版信息
Ann Oncol. 2010 May;21(5):1083-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp584. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
BACKGROUND
To reduce side-effects of corticosteroid-containing antiemetic regimens, tailoring antiemetic schedules to specific requirements of different patients could be of benefit. We evaluated the possibility to reduce the total dose of corticosteroids when palonosetron, a long-acting second-generation 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT(3)) receptor antagonist, is used.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Double-blind, multicentre, noninferiority study of chemotherapy-naive breast cancer patients receiving 0.25 mg palonosetron and 8 mg dexamethasone on day 1, randomly assigned to receive placebo (n = 151) or 4 mg b.i.d. dexamethasone (n = 149) on days 2 and 3. Primary end point was complete response (CR) rate (no emesis, no rescue medication) in the overall (days 1-5) period. Secondary end points were CR rates in the acute (day 1) and delayed (days 2-5) periods, rates of no emesis and no nausea and impact on daily functioning (Functional Living Index-Emesis).
RESULTS
Noninferiority between the two treatments was demonstrated by similar CR rates (P = 0.487) in the overall period. Most parameters showed that palonosetron and dexamethasone on day 1 only offer chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting protection similar to multiple-day dexamethasone administration.
CONCLUSION
In patients treated with a single injection of palonosetron on day 1, reducing dexamethasone is an option that is not associated with significant reduction in antiemetic control during the 5-day period or an impact on patient functioning.
背景
为了减少含皮质类固醇止吐方案的副作用,根据不同患者的具体需求定制止吐方案可能会有所帮助。我们评估了当使用长效第二代 5-羟色胺 3(5-HT3)受体拮抗剂帕洛诺司琼时,减少皮质类固醇总剂量的可能性。
材料和方法
这项双盲、多中心、非劣效性研究纳入了接受第 1 天 0.25 毫克帕洛诺司琼和 8 毫克地塞米松的化疗初治乳腺癌患者,随机分为接受安慰剂(n=151)或第 2 天和第 3 天接受 4 毫克地塞米松 bid(n=149)。主要终点是在整个(第 1-5 天)期间完全缓解(无呕吐,无解救药物)的发生率。次要终点是急性(第 1 天)和延迟(第 2-5 天)期间的完全缓解率、无呕吐和无恶心的发生率以及对日常功能的影响(生活功能指数-呕吐)。
结果
两种治疗方法的完全缓解率相似(P=0.487),表明非劣效性成立。大多数参数表明,第 1 天使用帕洛诺司琼和地塞米松一次注射,与多日地塞米松给药相比,仅提供类似的化疗引起的恶心和呕吐保护。
结论
在接受第 1 天单次注射帕洛诺司琼的患者中,减少地塞米松是一种选择,不会导致 5 天期间止吐控制显著降低或对患者功能产生影响。