依托孕烯醇酮醋酸酯与左炔诺孕酮用于紧急避孕的比较:一项随机非劣效性试验及荟萃分析。
Ulipristal acetate versus levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a randomised non-inferiority trial and meta-analysis.
机构信息
National Health Service Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
出版信息
Lancet. 2010 Feb 13;375(9714):555-62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60101-8. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
BACKGROUND
Emergency contraception can prevent unintended pregnancies, but current methods are only effective if used as soon as possible after sexual intercourse and before ovulation. We compared the efficacy and safety of ulipristal acetate with levonorgestrel for emergency contraception.
METHODS
Women with regular menstrual cycles who presented to a participating family planning clinic requesting emergency contraception within 5 days of unprotected sexual intercourse were eligible for enrolment in this randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. 2221 women were randomly assigned to receive a single, supervised dose of 30 mg ulipristal acetate (n=1104) or 1.5 mg levonorgestrel (n=1117) orally. Allocation was by block randomisation stratified by centre and time from unprotected sexual intercourse to treatment, with allocation concealment by identical opaque boxes labelled with a unique treatment number. Participants were masked to treatment assignment whereas investigators were not. Follow-up was done 5-7 days after expected onset of next menses. The primary endpoint was pregnancy rate in women who received emergency contraception within 72 h of unprotected sexual intercourse, with a non-inferiority margin of 1% point difference between groups (limit of 1.6 for odds ratio). Analysis was done on the efficacy-evaluable population, which excluded women lost to follow-up, those aged over 35 years, women with unknown follow-up pregnancy status, and those who had re-enrolled in the study. Additionally, we undertook a meta-analysis of our trial and an earlier study to assess the efficacy of ulipristal acetate compared with levonorgestrel. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00551616.
FINDINGS
In the efficacy-evaluable population, 1696 women received emergency contraception within 72 h of sexual intercourse (ulipristal acetate, n=844; levonorgestrel, n=852). There were 15 pregnancies in the ulipristal acetate group (1.8%, 95% CI 1.0-3.0) and 22 in the levonorgestrel group (2.6%, 1.7-3.9; odds ratio [OR] 0.68, 95% CI 0.35-1.31). In 203 women who received emergency contraception between 72 h and 120 h after sexual intercourse, there were three pregnancies, all of which were in the levonorgestrel group. The most frequent adverse event was headache (ulipristal acetate, 213 events [19.3%] in 1104 women; levonorgestrel, 211 events [18.9%] in 1117 women). Two serious adverse events were judged possibly related to use of emergency contraception; a case of dizziness in the ulipristal acetate group and a molar pregnancy in the levonorgestrel group. In the meta-analysis (0-72 h), there were 22 (1.4%) pregnancies in 1617 women in the ulipristal acetate group and 35 (2.2%) in 1625 women in the levonorgestrel group (OR 0.58, 0.33-0.99; p=0.046).
INTERPRETATION
Ulipristal acetate provides women and health-care providers with an effective alternative for emergency contraception that can be used up to 5 days after unprotected sexual intercourse.
FUNDING
HRA Pharma.
背景
紧急避孕可以防止意外怀孕,但目前的方法只有在性交后尽快使用,并且在排卵前使用才有效。我们比较了醋酸乌利司他和左炔诺孕酮用于紧急避孕的效果和安全性。
方法
在参加计划生育诊所的有规律月经周期的女性中,在无保护的性行为后 5 天内要求紧急避孕的人有资格参加这项随机、多中心、非劣效性试验。2221 名女性被随机分配接受单次、监督剂量的 30 毫克醋酸乌利司他(n=1104)或 1.5 毫克左炔诺孕酮(n=1117)口服。按中心和无保护性行为至治疗的时间分层进行块随机分配,通过标记有唯一治疗编号的相同不透明盒子进行分配隐藏。参与者对治疗分配不知情,而研究人员则不知情。随访在预计下次月经来潮后 5-7 天进行。主要终点是在无保护性行为后 72 小时内接受紧急避孕的女性的妊娠率,组间差异为 1%(比值比的上限为 1.6)。分析在疗效可评估人群中进行,该人群排除了随访丢失的女性、年龄超过 35 岁的女性、未知随访妊娠状态的女性以及重新参加研究的女性。此外,我们对我们的试验和早期研究进行了荟萃分析,以评估醋酸乌利司他与左炔诺孕酮相比的疗效。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT00551616。
结果
在疗效可评估人群中,1696 名女性在性交后 72 小时内接受了紧急避孕(醋酸乌利司他组,n=844;左炔诺孕酮组,n=852)。醋酸乌利司他组有 15 例妊娠(1.8%,95%CI 1.0-3.0),左炔诺孕酮组有 22 例妊娠(2.6%,1.7-3.9;比值比[OR]0.68,95%CI 0.35-1.31)。在 72 至 120 小时之间接受紧急避孕的 203 名女性中,有 3 例妊娠,均发生在左炔诺孕酮组。最常见的不良事件是头痛(醋酸乌利司他组 1104 名女性中有 213 例[19.3%];左炔诺孕酮组 1117 名女性中有 211 例[18.9%])。两例严重不良事件被判断可能与使用紧急避孕药有关;一例头晕发生在醋酸乌利司他组,一例葡萄胎发生在左炔诺孕酮组。在荟萃分析(0-72 小时)中,醋酸乌利司他组 1617 名女性中有 22 例(1.4%)妊娠,左炔诺孕酮组 1625 名女性中有 35 例(2.2%)妊娠(OR 0.58,0.33-0.99;p=0.046)。
结论
醋酸乌利司他为女性和医疗保健提供者提供了一种有效的紧急避孕替代方案,可在无保护性行为后 5 天内使用。
资金来源
HRA Pharma。