通过转移(栖息地)来减少印度人类主导景观中与豹的冲突。

Translocation as a tool for mitigating conflict with leopards in human-dominated landscapes of India.

机构信息

Kaati Trust, Raanwara, Bavdhan, Pune, India.

出版信息

Conserv Biol. 2011 Feb;25(1):133-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01599.x. Epub 2010 Nov 5.

Abstract

We examined the efficacy of a translocation program in which large numbers of leopards (Panthera pardus fusca) were trapped in human-dominated landscapes where livestock attacks were common and human attacks rare and released into adjoining forested areas in an attempt to reduce leopard presence and mitigate conflicts at the capture site. In the year starting in February of 2001, 29 leopards were captured in the human-dominated rural landscape of the Junnar region (4275 km(2) , 185 people/km(2) ), Maharashtra, India, and released an average of 39.5 km away in adjoining forests. Eleven leopards were also relocated to the same forests from other districts. Prior to the large-scale translocation program, an average of four leopard attacks on humans occurred each year between 1993 and 2001. After the translocation program was initiated, the average increased substantially to 17 attacks. Linear and logistic models showed that attack frequency increased in Junnar following nearby releases of leopards and decreased when leopards were removed for releases far away; that attacks became more lethal when the number of leopards introduced from other districts increased; and that attacks were most likely to occur in the regions where the largest number of leopards had been introduced from other areas. These results suggest that leopards did not stay at the release sites and that translocation induced attacks on people. Potential explanations for these results include increased aggression induced by stress of the translocation process, movement through unfamiliar human-dominated landscapes following release, and loss of fear of humans due to familiarity with humans acquired during captivity. Our results show that reactive solutions to attacks on humans by leopards, such as translocation, could in fact increase human-leopard conflict. Measures to reduce human-carnivore conflicts may include more effective compensation procedures to pay livestock owners for the loss of animals to predation by carnivores, providing better methods of protection for livestock, and encouraging greater social acceptance of the presence of carnivores in human-dominated landscapes.

摘要

我们研究了一项转移计划的效果,该计划大规模捕捉在人类主导的景观中常见家畜袭击但罕见人袭击的豹子(Panthera pardus fusca),然后将其释放到毗邻的森林中,试图减少豹子的存在并减轻捕获地点的冲突。在 2001 年 2 月开始的那一年,印度马哈拉施特拉邦朱纳尔地区(4275 平方公里,185 人/平方公里)的人类主导的农村景观中捕获了 29 只豹子,并平均在 39.5 公里外的毗邻森林中释放。11 只豹子也从其他地区被重新安置到相同的森林中。在大规模转移计划之前,1993 年至 2001 年期间,每年平均有 4 起豹子袭击人类的事件。转移计划启动后,平均袭击次数大幅增加到 17 次。线性和逻辑模型表明,在朱纳尔附近释放豹子后,袭击频率增加,而当豹子被远距离释放时,袭击频率下降;从其他地区引入的豹子数量增加,袭击变得更加致命;而袭击最有可能发生在从其他地区引入豹子数量最多的地区。这些结果表明,豹子并没有留在释放地点,而是转移引发了对人类的攻击。这些结果的潜在解释包括转移过程中的压力引起的攻击性增加、释放后通过不熟悉的人类主导景观的移动,以及由于在囚禁期间对人类的熟悉而对人类失去恐惧。我们的结果表明,针对豹子袭击人类的反应性解决方案,例如转移,实际上可能会增加人类与豹子的冲突。减少人与食肉动物冲突的措施可能包括更有效的补偿程序,为因食肉动物捕食而失去动物的牲畜所有者提供赔偿,为牲畜提供更好的保护方法,并鼓励在人类主导的景观中更广泛地接受食肉动物的存在。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索