口服利伐沙班治疗有症状的静脉血栓栓塞症。

Oral rivaroxaban for symptomatic venous thromboembolism.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 23;363(26):2499-510. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1007903. Epub 2010 Dec 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, may provide a simple, fixed-dose regimen for treating acute deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and for continued treatment, without the need for laboratory monitoring.

METHODS

We conducted an open-label, randomized, event-driven, noninferiority study that compared oral rivaroxaban alone (15 mg twice daily for 3 weeks, followed by 20 mg once daily) with subcutaneous enoxaparin followed by a vitamin K antagonist (either warfarin or acenocoumarol) for 3, 6, or 12 months in patients with acute, symptomatic DVT. In parallel, we carried out a double-blind, randomized, event-driven superiority study that compared rivaroxaban alone (20 mg once daily) with placebo for an additional 6 or 12 months in patients who had completed 6 to 12 months of treatment for venous thromboembolism. The primary efficacy outcome for both studies was recurrent venous thromboembolism. The principal safety outcome was major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding in the initial-treatment study and major bleeding in the continued-treatment study.

RESULTS

The study of rivaroxaban for acute DVT included 3449 patients: 1731 given rivaroxaban and 1718 given enoxaparin plus a vitamin K antagonist. Rivaroxaban had noninferior efficacy with respect to the primary outcome (36 events [2.1%], vs. 51 events with enoxaparin-vitamin K antagonist [3.0%]; hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44 to 1.04; P<0.001). The principal safety outcome occurred in 8.1% of the patients in each group. In the continued-treatment study, which included 602 patients in the rivaroxaban group and 594 in the placebo group, rivaroxaban had superior efficacy (8 events [1.3%], vs. 42 with placebo [7.1%]; hazard ratio, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.39; P<0.001). Four patients in the rivaroxaban group had nonfatal major bleeding (0.7%), versus none in the placebo group (P=0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

Rivaroxaban offers a simple, single-drug approach to the short-term and continued treatment of venous thrombosis that may improve the benefit-to-risk profile of anticoagulation. (Funded by Bayer Schering Pharma and Ortho-McNeil; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00440193 and NCT00439725.).

摘要

背景

口服因子 Xa 抑制剂利伐沙班可提供一种简单、固定剂量的方案,用于治疗急性深静脉血栓形成(DVT)和持续治疗,无需实验室监测。

方法

我们进行了一项开放性、随机、事件驱动、非劣效性研究,比较了单独口服利伐沙班(15mg,每日 2 次,持续 3 周,然后每日 20mg)与皮下依诺肝素加维生素 K 拮抗剂(华法林或醋硝香豆素)治疗急性有症状的 DVT 患者 3、6 或 12 个月。同时,我们进行了一项双盲、随机、事件驱动的优效性研究,比较了单独口服利伐沙班(20mg,每日 1 次)与安慰剂在静脉血栓栓塞症治疗 6 至 12 个月后再治疗 6 或 12 个月的患者的疗效。两项研究的主要疗效终点均为复发性静脉血栓栓塞症。主要安全性终点是初始治疗研究中的大出血或临床上相关的非大出血,以及持续治疗研究中的大出血。

结果

利伐沙班治疗急性 DVT 的研究纳入了 3449 例患者:1731 例接受利伐沙班治疗,1718 例接受依诺肝素加维生素 K 拮抗剂治疗。利伐沙班在主要结局(36 例[2.1%]与依诺肝素-维生素 K 拮抗剂组 51 例[3.0%];风险比,0.68;95%置信区间[CI],0.44 至 1.04;P<0.001)方面非劣效。两组各有 8.1%的患者发生主要安全性结局。在包括利伐沙班组 602 例和安慰剂组 594 例的持续治疗研究中,利伐沙班的疗效更优(8 例[1.3%]与安慰剂组 42 例[7.1%];风险比,0.18;95%CI,0.09 至 0.39;P<0.001)。利伐沙班组有 4 例非致命性大出血(0.7%),安慰剂组无大出血(P=0.11)。

结论

利伐沙班为静脉血栓形成的短期和持续治疗提供了一种简单的单药治疗方法,可能改善抗凝的获益-风险比。(由拜耳施贵宝和 Ortho-McNeil 资助;ClinicalTrials.gov 编号,NCT00440193 和 NCT00439725。)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索