德谷胰岛素治疗 1 型糖尿病:新一代超长效胰岛素与甘精胰岛素的随机对照试验。
Insulin degludec in type 1 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial of a new-generation ultra-long-acting insulin compared with insulin glargine.
机构信息
Oslo University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Oslo, Norway.
出版信息
Diabetes Care. 2011 Mar;34(3):661-5. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1925. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
OBJECTIVE
Insulin degludec (IDeg) is a basal insulin that forms soluble multihexamers after subcutaneous injection, resulting in an ultra-long action profile. We assessed the efficacy and safety of IDeg formulations administered once daily in combination with mealtime insulin aspart in people with type 1 diabetes.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
In this 16-week, randomized, open-label trial, participants (mean: 45.8 years old, A1C 8.4%, fasting plasma glucose [FPG] 9.9 mmol/L, BMI 26.9 kg/m(2)) received subcutaneous injections of IDeg(A) (600 μmol/L; n = 59), IDeg(B) (900 μmol/L; n = 60), or insulin glargine (IGlar; n = 59), all given once daily in the evening. Insulin aspart was administered at mealtimes. RESULTS At 16 weeks, mean A1C was comparable for IDeg(A) (7.8 ± 0.8%), IDeg(B) (8.0 ± 1.0%), and IGlar (7.6 ± 0.8%), as was FPG (8.3 ± 4.0, 8.3 ± 2.8, and 8.9 ± 3.5 mmol/L, respectively). Estimated mean rates of confirmed hypoglycemia were 28% lower for IDeg(A) compared with IGlar (rate ratio [RR]: 0.72 [95% CI 0.52-1.00]) and 10% lower for IDeg(B) compared with IGlar (RR: 0.90 [0.65-1.24]); rates of nocturnal hypoglycemia were 58% lower for IDeg(A) (RR: 0.42 [0.25-0.69]) and 29% lower for IDeg(B) (RR: 0.71 [0.44-1.16]). Mean total daily insulin dose was similar to baseline. The frequency and pattern of adverse events was similar between insulin treatments.
CONCLUSIONS
In this clinical exploratory phase 2 trial in people with type 1 diabetes, IDeg is safe and well tolerated and provides comparable glycemic control to IGlar at similar doses, with reduced rates of hypoglycemia.
目的
德谷胰岛素(IDeg)是一种基础胰岛素,皮下注射后形成可溶性多六聚体,从而呈现超长作用谱。我们评估了每日 1 次给予德谷胰岛素与餐时门冬胰岛素联合治疗 1 型糖尿病患者的疗效和安全性。
研究设计和方法
在这项为期 16 周、随机、开放标签的试验中,参与者(平均年龄:45.8 岁,A1C:8.4%,空腹血糖[FPG]:9.9mmol/L,BMI:26.9kg/m²)接受了德谷胰岛素 A(600μmol/L;n=59)、德谷胰岛素 B(900μmol/L;n=60)或甘精胰岛素(IGlar;n=59)的皮下注射,均在晚上每日 1 次给药。门冬胰岛素在进餐时给药。
结果
16 周时,德谷胰岛素 A(7.8±0.8%)、德谷胰岛素 B(8.0±1.0%)和 IGlar(7.6±0.8%)的平均 A1C 相似,FPG 也相似(分别为 8.3±4.0、8.3±2.8 和 8.9±3.5mmol/L)。与 IGlar 相比,德谷胰岛素 A 的确认性低血糖发生率估计平均降低 28%(RR:0.72[95%CI:0.52-1.00]),德谷胰岛素 B 的发生率降低 10%(RR:0.90[0.65-1.24]);德谷胰岛素 A 的夜间低血糖发生率降低 58%(RR:0.42[0.25-0.69]),德谷胰岛素 B 的发生率降低 29%(RR:0.71[0.44-1.16])。总日胰岛素剂量与基线相似。不同胰岛素治疗的不良反应发生频率和模式相似。
结论
在这项 1 型糖尿病患者的临床探索性 2 期试验中,德谷胰岛素安全且耐受良好,在相似剂量下提供与 IGlar 相当的血糖控制,低血糖发生率降低。