BEAM 研究:一项随机Ⅱ期临床研究,旨在评估贝伐珠单抗联合卡铂紫杉醇方案一线治疗晚期黑色素瘤的疗效。
BEAM: a randomized phase II study evaluating the activity of bevacizumab in combination with carboplatin plus paclitaxel in patients with previously untreated advanced melanoma.
机构信息
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
出版信息
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jan 1;30(1):34-41. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.34.6270. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
PURPOSE
Metastatic melanoma, a highly vascularized tumor with strong expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, has an overall poor prognosis. We conducted a placebo-controlled, double-blind phase II study of carboplatin plus paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab in patients with previously untreated metastatic melanoma.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Patients were randomly assigned in a two-to-one ratio to carboplatin (area under the curve, 5) plus paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg; CPB) or placebo (CP) administered intravenously once every 3 weeks. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary end point. Secondary end points included overall survival (OS) and safety.
RESULTS
Two hundred fourteen patients (73% with M1c disease) were randomly assigned. With a median follow-up of 13 months, median PFS was 4.2 months for the CP arm (n = 71) and 5.6 months for the CPB arm (n = 143; hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; P = .1414). Overall response rates were 16.4% and 25.5%, respectively (P = .1577). With 13-month follow-up, median OS was 8.6 months in the CP arm versus 12.3 months in the CPB arm (HR, 0.67; P = .0366), whereas in an evaluation 4 months later, it was 9.2 versus 12.3 months, respectively (HR, 0.79; P = .1916). In patients with elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (n = 84), median PFS and OS were longer in the CPB arm (PFS: 4.4 v 2.7 months; HR, 0.62; OS: 8.5 v 7.5 months; HR, 0.52). No new safety signals were observed.
CONCLUSION
The study did not meet the primary objective of statistically significant improvement in PFS with the addition of bevacizumab to carboplatin plus paclitaxel. A larger phase III study will be necessary to determine whether there is benefit to the addition of bevacizumab to carboplatin plus paclitaxel in this disease setting.
目的
转移性黑色素瘤是一种高度血管化的肿瘤,血管内皮生长因子表达强烈,总体预后较差。我们进行了一项安慰剂对照、双盲的 II 期研究,评估卡铂联合紫杉醇联合或不联合贝伐单抗治疗未经治疗的转移性黑色素瘤患者的疗效。
患者和方法
患者以 2:1 的比例随机分配至卡铂(曲线下面积 5)联合紫杉醇(175mg/m²)加贝伐单抗(15mg/kg;CPB 组)或安慰剂(CP 组)组,每 3 周静脉输注一次。无进展生存期(PFS)是主要终点。次要终点包括总生存期(OS)和安全性。
结果
214 例患者(73%为 M1c 期疾病)被随机分配。中位随访 13 个月时,CP 组(n=71)中位 PFS 为 4.2 个月,CPB 组(n=143)中位 PFS 为 5.6 个月(风险比 [HR],0.78;P=0.1414)。总缓解率分别为 16.4%和 25.5%(P=0.1577)。在 13 个月的随访中,CP 组中位 OS 为 8.6 个月,CPB 组为 12.3 个月(HR,0.67;P=0.0366),而在 4 个月后的评估中,两组分别为 9.2 个月和 12.3 个月(HR,0.79;P=0.1916)。在血清乳酸脱氢酶升高的患者(n=84)中,CPB 组的中位 PFS 和 OS 更长(PFS:4.4 比 2.7 个月;HR,0.62;OS:8.5 比 7.5 个月;HR,0.52)。未观察到新的安全性信号。
结论
该研究未达到主要终点,即与卡铂联合紫杉醇相比,添加贝伐单抗可显著改善 PFS。在该疾病背景下,还需要进行更大规模的 III 期研究以确定添加贝伐单抗是否能给卡铂联合紫杉醇带来获益。