心脏外科重症监护病房中连续无创动脉压(CNAP™)监测仪与有创动脉血压监测仪的比较。

A comparison of a continuous noninvasive arterial pressure (CNAP™) monitor with an invasive arterial blood pressure monitor in the cardiac surgical ICU.

作者信息

Jagadeesh A M, Singh Naveen G, Mahankali Subramanyam

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Anaesthesiology, Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research, Jayanagar, Bangalore, India.

出版信息

Ann Card Anaesth. 2012 Jul-Sep;15(3):180-4. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.97973.

Abstract

Accurate measurement and display of arterial blood pressure is essential for rational management of adult cardiac surgical patients. Because of the lower risk of complications, noninvasive monitoring methods gain importance. A newly developed continuous noninvasive arterial blood pressure (CNAP™) monitor is available and has been validated perioperatively. In a prospective study we compared the CNAP™ monitoring device with invasive arterial blood pressure (IAP) measurement in 30 patients in a cardiac surgical Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Patients were either mechanically ventilated or spontaneously breathing, with or without inotropes. CNAP™ was applied on two fingers of the hand contralateral to the IAP monitoring catheter. Systolic, diastolic and mean pressure data were recorded every minute for 2 h simultaneously for both IAP and CNAP™. Statistical analysis included construction of mountain plot and Bland Altman plots for assessing limits of agreement and bias (accuracy) calculation. Three thousand and six hundred pairs of data were analyzed. The CNAP™ systolic arterial pressure bias was 10.415 mmHg and the CNAP™ diastolic arterial pressure bias was -5.3386 mmHg; the mean arterial pressure (MAP) of CNAP™ was close to the MAP of IAP, with a bias of 0.03944 mmHg. The Bland Altman plot showed a uniform distribution and a good agreement of all arterial blood pressure values between CNAP™ and IAP. Percentage within limits of agreement was 94.5%, 95.1% and 99.4% for systolic, diastolic and MAP. Calculated limits of agreement were -4.60 to 25.43, -13.38 to 2.70 and -5.95 to 6.03 mmHg for systolic, diastolic and mean BP, respectively. The mountain plot showed similar results as the Bland Altman plots. We conclude CNAP™ is a reliable, noninvasive, continuous blood pressure monitor that provides real-time estimates of arterial pressure comparable to those generated by an invasive arterial catheter system. CNAP™ can be used as an alternative to IAP.

摘要

准确测量和显示动脉血压对于合理管理成年心脏手术患者至关重要。由于并发症风险较低,非侵入性监测方法变得愈发重要。一种新开发的连续无创动脉血压(CNAP™)监测仪已经问世,并已在围手术期得到验证。在一项前瞻性研究中,我们在心脏外科重症监护病房(ICU)对30例患者的CNAP™监测设备与有创动脉血压(IAP)测量进行了比较。患者要么接受机械通气,要么自主呼吸,使用或不使用血管活性药物。CNAP™应用于与IAP监测导管对侧的手部两个手指上。同时每分钟记录IAP和CNAP™的收缩压、舒张压和平均压数据,持续2小时。统计分析包括构建山形图和布兰德-奥特曼图,以评估一致性界限和偏差(准确性)计算。分析了3600对数据。CNAP™收缩压偏差为10.415 mmHg,CNAP™舒张压偏差为 -5.3386 mmHg;CNAP™的平均动脉压(MAP)接近IAP的MAP,偏差为0.03944 mmHg。布兰德-奥特曼图显示所有动脉血压值在CNAP™和IAP之间分布均匀且一致性良好。收缩压、舒张压和MAP的一致性界限内百分比分别为94.5%、95.1%和99.4%。收缩压、舒张压和平均血压的计算一致性界限分别为 -4.60至25.43、-13.38至2.70和 -5.95至6.03 mmHg。山形图显示的结果与布兰德-奥特曼图相似。我们得出结论,CNAP™是一种可靠的、非侵入性的、连续血压监测仪,可提供与有创动脉导管系统产生的动脉压相当的实时估计值。CNAP™可作为IAP的替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索