Suppr超能文献

Rasch 分析显示黄斑疾病生活质量问卷的乘法评分存在问题。

Rasch analysis reveals problems with multiplicative scoring in the macular disease quality of life questionnaire.

机构信息

Center for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Ophthalmology. 2012 Nov;119(11):2351-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.05.031. Epub 2012 Sep 8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate validity and psychometric characteristics of the Macular Disease Quality of Life questionnaire (MacDQoL), a multiplicative rating scale designed to measure vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) in macular diseases and age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

We included 108 patients with neovascular AMD at baseline before ranibizumab treatment.

METHODS

The psychometric properties of the MacDQoL were assessed using Rasch analysis, exploring key indices such as response category functioning, instrument unidimensionality, discriminant ability, and targeting of item difficulty to patient ability.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Measurement characteristics of the MacDQoL.

RESULTS

In the MacDQoL's native form, the majority of response categories were underutilized and thresholds disordered. This could not be remedied without eliminating the importance ratings owing to the ambiguous nature of the response categories. Scaling problems were resolved by using the impairment rating scale only and collapsing response categories to 4. However, the MacDQoL was multidimensional, necessitating the omission of a number of items and splitting it into an activity limitation and mobility and a socioemotional well-being scale. This improved the psychometric parameters of the revised MacDQoL, although no correlation with clinical measures such as visual acuity was found.

CONCLUSIONS

The multiplicative rating scale of the MacDQoL is flawed and does not provide scientific measurement of VRQoL. Measurement can be restored with a series of revisions to the instrument. This study reinforces the importance of considering rating scale design when choosing patient reported outcomes instruments for healthcare research.

摘要

目的

评估黄斑疾病生活质量问卷(MacDQoL)的有效性和心理计量学特征,这是一种乘法评分量表,旨在测量黄斑疾病和年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)患者的与视力相关的生活质量(VRQoL)。

设计

横断面研究。

参与者

我们纳入了 108 名接受雷珠单抗治疗前的新生血管性 AMD 患者。

方法

使用 Rasch 分析评估 MacDQoL 的心理计量学特性,探讨关键指标,如反应类别功能、仪器的单一维度、判别能力以及项目难度对患者能力的针对性。

主要观察指标

MacDQoL 的测量特征。

结果

在 MacDQoL 的原始形式中,大多数反应类别未被充分利用,且阈限值紊乱。由于反应类别的模糊性质,无法通过消除重要性评分来纠正这些问题。通过仅使用损伤评分量表并将反应类别合并为 4 个,可以解决定标问题。然而,MacDQoL 是多维的,需要删除一些项目,并将其分为活动受限和移动以及社会情感健康量表。这改善了修订后的 MacDQoL 的心理计量学参数,尽管与视力等临床指标没有相关性。

结论

MacDQoL 的乘法评分量表存在缺陷,无法对 VRQoL 进行科学测量。通过对仪器进行一系列修订,可以恢复测量。本研究强调了在为医疗保健研究选择患者报告的结果工具时,考虑评分量表设计的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验