提出一种用于评估结直肠癌肿瘤芽生的 10 个高功率场评分方法。

Proposal for a 10-high-power-fields scoring method for the assessment of tumor budding in colorectal cancer.

机构信息

Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Mod Pathol. 2013 Feb;26(2):295-301. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2012.155. Epub 2012 Sep 28.

Abstract

Although tumor budding is linked to adverse prognosis in colorectal cancer, it remains largely unreported in daily diagnostic work due to the absence of a standardized scoring method. Our aim was to assess the inter-observer agreement of a novel 10-high-power-fields method for assessment of tumor budding at the invasive front and to confirm the prognostic value of tumor budding in our setting of colorectal cancers. Whole tissue sections of 215 colorectal cancers with full clinico-pathological and follow-up information were stained with cytokeratin AE1/AE3 antibody. Presence of buds was scored across 10-high-power fields at the invasive front by two pathologists and two additional observers were asked to score 50 cases of tumor budding randomly selected from the larger cohort. The measurements were correlated to the patient and tumor characteristics. Inter-observer agreement and correlation between observers' scores were excellent (P<0.0001; intraclass correlation coefficient=0.96). A test subgroup of 65 patients (30%) was used to define a valid cutoff score for high-grade tumor budding and the remaining 70% of the patients were entered into the analysis. High-grade budding was defined as an average of ≥10 buds across 10-high-power fields. High-grade budding was associated with a higher tumor grade (P<0.0001), higher TNM stage (P=0.0003), vascular invasion (P<0.0001), infiltrating tumor border configuration (P<0.0001) and reduced survival (P<0.0001). Multivariate analysis confirmed its independent prognostic effect (P=0.007) when adjusting for TNM stage and adjuvant therapy. Using 10-high-power fields for evaluating tumor budding has independent prognostic value and shows excellent inter-observer agreement. Like the BRE and Gleason scores in breast and prostate cancers, respectively, tumor budding could be a basis for a prognostic score in colorectal cancer.

摘要

虽然肿瘤芽与结直肠癌的不良预后相关,但由于缺乏标准化评分方法,在日常诊断工作中尚未广泛报道。我们的目的是评估一种新的 10 高倍视野方法评估肿瘤芽在侵袭前沿的评估的观察者间一致性,并在我们的结直肠癌中确认肿瘤芽的预后价值。215 例结直肠癌的全组织切片均用细胞角蛋白 AE1/AE3 抗体染色。两名病理学家在侵袭前沿的 10 个高倍视野中对芽的存在进行评分,另外两名观察者被要求对从较大队列中随机选择的 50 例肿瘤芽进行评分。这些测量与患者和肿瘤特征相关。观察者之间的评分具有极好的一致性(P<0.0001;组内相关系数=0.96)。将 65 例患者(30%)的一个测试亚组用于定义高级别肿瘤芽的有效截断评分,其余 70%的患者进入分析。高级别芽被定义为 10 个高倍视野中平均≥10 个芽。高级别芽与较高的肿瘤分级(P<0.0001)、较高的 TNM 分期(P=0.0003)、血管侵犯(P<0.0001)、侵袭性肿瘤边界形态(P<0.0001)和降低的生存率(P<0.0001)相关。多变量分析证实,在调整 TNM 分期和辅助治疗后,其具有独立的预后作用(P=0.007)。使用 10 个高倍视野评估肿瘤芽具有独立的预后价值,并显示出极好的观察者间一致性。与乳腺癌和前列腺癌中的 BRE 和 Gleason 评分分别相似,肿瘤芽可能是结直肠癌预后评分的基础。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索