严重创伤性脑损伤后的意识障碍:一项瑞典-冰岛研究,探讨其发生率、结局及对优化护理路径的影响。
Disorders of consciousness after severe traumatic brain injury: a Swedish-Icelandic study of incidence, outcomes and implications for optimizing care pathways.
机构信息
Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institute and University Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Stockholm, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm.
出版信息
J Rehabil Med. 2013 Sep;45(8):741-8. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1167.
BACKGROUND
Very severe traumatic brain injury may cause disorders of consciousness in the form of coma, unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (also known as vegetative state) or minimally conscious state. Previous studies of outcome for these patients largely pre-date the 2002 definition of minimally conscious state.
OBJECTIVES
To establish the numbers of patients with disorder of consciousness at 3 weeks, 3 months and 1 year after severe traumatic brain injury, and to relate conscious state 3 weeks after injury to outcomes at 1 year.
DESIGN
Multi-centre, prospective, observational study of severe traumatic brain injury.
INCLUSION CRITERIA
lowest (non-sedated) Glasgow Coma Scale 3-8 during the first 24 h; requirement for neurosurgical intensive care; age 18-65 years; alive 3 weeks after injury. Diagnosis of coma, unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, minimally conscious state or emerged from minimally conscious state was based on clinical and Coma Recovery Scale Revised assessments 3 weeks, 3 months and 1 year after injury. One-year outcome was measured with Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE).
RESULTS
A total of 103 patients was included in the study. Of these, 81% were followed up to 1 year (76% alive, 5% dead). Three weeks after injury 36 were in coma, unresponsive wakefulness syndrome or minimally conscious state and 11 were anaesthetized. Numbers of patients who had emerged from minimally conscious state 1 year after injury, according to status at 3 weeks were: coma (0/6), unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (9/17), minimally conscious state (13/13), anaesthetized (9/11). Outcome at 1 year was good (GOSE > 4) for half of patients in minimally conscious state or anaesthetized at 3 weeks, but for none of the patients in coma or unresponsive wakefulness syndrome. These differences in outcome were not revealed by prognostic predictions based on acute data.
CONCLUSION
Patients in minimally conscious state or anaesthetized 3 weeks after injury have a better prognosis than patients in coma or unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, which could not be explained by acute prognostic models.
背景
非常严重的创伤性脑损伤可能导致昏迷、无反应性觉醒综合征(也称为植物状态)或最小意识状态等意识障碍。以前对这些患者的预后研究主要是在 2002 年最小意识状态定义之前进行的。
目的
确定创伤性脑损伤后 3 周、3 个月和 1 年时意识障碍患者的数量,并将损伤后 3 周时的意识状态与 1 年时的结果相关联。
设计
多中心、前瞻性、创伤性脑损伤观察研究。
纳入标准
最初 24 小时内最低(非镇静)格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为 3-8 分;需要神经外科重症监护;年龄 18-65 岁;损伤后 3 周存活。昏迷、无反应性觉醒综合征、最小意识状态或从最小意识状态中恢复的诊断基于损伤后 3 周、3 个月和 1 年的临床和昏迷恢复量表修订评估。1 年的预后采用格拉斯哥预后量表扩展版(GOSE)进行测量。
结果
共有 103 例患者纳入研究。其中,81%的患者随访至 1 年(存活 76%,死亡 5%)。损伤后 3 周时,36 例患者处于昏迷、无反应性觉醒综合征或最小意识状态,11 例患者处于麻醉状态。根据损伤后 3 周的状态,1 年后从最小意识状态中恢复的患者人数为:昏迷(6/6)、无反应性觉醒综合征(17/17)、最小意识状态(13/13)、麻醉(11/11)。损伤后 3 周时处于最小意识状态或麻醉状态的患者,1 年后的预后良好(GOSE>4)占一半,但昏迷或无反应性觉醒综合征的患者没有。这些预后差异无法通过基于急性数据的预后预测来解释。
结论
损伤后 3 周时处于最小意识状态或麻醉状态的患者预后优于昏迷或无反应性觉醒综合征的患者,这不能用急性预后模型来解释。