Division of Nutrition, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Søborg, Denmark.
Research Centre for Prevention and Health, The Capital Region of Denmark, Glostrup, Denmark; Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Faculty of Medicine, University of Aalborg, Aalborg, Denmark.
Clin Nutr. 2014 Dec;33(6):1033-40. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.10.024. Epub 2013 Nov 9.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Iodine fortification is widespread. Systematic monitoring of iodine fortification programs should be carried out to secure an optimal fortification level. Our aim was to investigate the effectiveness of the Danish iodine fortification program by comparing iodine excretion at baseline and at 11-year follow-up, and to study determinants for any change in iodine intake including dietary habits, education, life style factors and health parameters.
A follow-up study based on the Danish DanThyr cohort examined in 1997-1998 just before iodine fortification was introduced, and reexamined in 2008-2010. In total, 2465 (59.1%) adult participants were reexamined.
Median (IQR) iodine concentration in urine had increased by 19 (-25-68) μg/L to 83 (47-133) μg/L. Estimated 24-h iodine excretion had increased by 36 (-21-95) μg/24-h to 134 (93-206), and calculated total iodine intake (diet plus supplements) had increased by 16 (-18-48) μg/day. Iodine excretion had increased significantly in all age and gender groups, but was still below the recommended amount at follow-up. The increase in iodine excretion was positively associated with changes in milk intake, with changes in the use of iodine supplements, and with bread intake at follow-up. Salt intake, education, self-rated health, smoking, alcohol intake and physical activity were not associated with the increase in iodine excretion.
The strategy to combat iodine deficiency in Denmark seems to be working because the fortification led to increased urinary iodine excretion in (almost) all participants. However, the level of iodine fortification of salt is too low.
碘强化在全球广泛实施。为确保最佳强化水平,应对碘强化计划进行系统性监测。本研究旨在通过比较基线和 11 年随访时的尿碘排泄量,评估丹麦碘强化计划的效果,并研究包括饮食习惯、教育程度、生活方式因素和健康参数在内的各种因素对碘摄入量变化的影响。
一项基于丹麦 DanThyr 队列的随访研究于 1997-1998 年在引入碘强化之前进行,2008-2010 年进行了再次检查。共有 2465 名(59.1%)成年参与者接受了再次检查。
尿碘浓度中位数(IQR)从 83(47-133)μg/L 增加到 19(-25-68)μg/L。24 小时尿碘排泄量估计值从 134(93-206)μg/24-h 增加到 36(21-95)μg/24-h,计算的总碘摄入量(饮食加补充剂)增加了 16(-18-48)μg/天。所有年龄和性别组的尿碘排泄量均显著增加,但在随访时仍低于推荐量。尿碘排泄量的增加与牛奶摄入量的变化、碘补充剂使用的变化以及随访时面包摄入量的变化呈正相关。盐摄入量、教育程度、自我报告的健康状况、吸烟、饮酒和身体活动与尿碘排泄量的增加无关。
丹麦防治碘缺乏的策略似乎是有效的,因为强化导致了(几乎)所有参与者的尿碘排泄量增加。然而,盐的碘强化水平仍然过低。