Javed Faisal, Whitwell Russell, Hajioff Daniel, Robinson Philip, Rea David, Macleod Iain, White Paul, Nunez Desmond A
Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Royal United Hospital, Combe Park, Bath, BA1 3NG, UK,
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Mar;272(3):543-50. doi: 10.1007/s00405-013-2812-6. Epub 2013 Dec 14.
To pilot a substantive randomized control trial comparing post-operative external ear canal pack with no ear pack after middle ear surgery, 32 adults undergoing primary posterior bony canal wall preserving middle ear surgery were randomized to have either a bismuth iodoform paraffin paste pack or no ear pack post-operatively. Outcome measures included clinician- and patient-recorded visual analogue scale scores for ear signs and symptoms at 3 weeks and 3 months and audiometric findings at 3 months post-operatively. There was no statistically significant inter-group difference in 3-week clinician and patient cumulative scores for ear signs and symptoms. There was also no significant difference in graft take rate, appearance of ear canals and audiometric results in either group at 3 months. No difference in ear symptoms, clinician findings or hearing was demonstrated between patients with a post-operative pack compared to those without a pack following middle ear surgery in this pilot study.
为开展一项实质性随机对照试验,比较中耳手术后外耳道术后填塞与不填塞的效果,32例接受初次保留后骨壁的中耳手术的成人被随机分为术后使用碘仿铋石蜡糊填塞组或不填塞组。观察指标包括术后3周和3个月时临床医生及患者记录的耳部体征和症状的视觉模拟评分,以及术后3个月时的听力测定结果。术后3周临床医生和患者记录的耳部体征和症状累积评分在组间无统计学显著差异。3个月时两组的移植物成活率、外耳道外观及听力测定结果也无显著差异。在这项初步研究中,中耳手术后使用填塞物的患者与未使用填塞物的患者在耳部症状、临床检查结果或听力方面均未显示出差异。