Suppr超能文献

[颈动脉海绵窦瘘:临床与病理相关性]

[Carotid-cavernous fistula: clinical and pathological correlations].

作者信息

Fel A, Szatmary Z, Sourour N, Bodaghi B, LeHoang P, Touitou V

机构信息

Service d'ophtalmologie, hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.

Service de neuro-radiologie interventionnelle, hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.

出版信息

J Fr Ophtalmol. 2014 Jun;37(6):462-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 May 1.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Depending upon the type of communication between the internal carotid artery and the cavernous sinus, two types of carotid-cavernous fistulae can be distinguished: direct carotid-cavernous fistula (DCCF), for which diagnosis is usually easy because of the obvious signs of orbital congestion, and indirect carotid-cavernous fistula (ICCF) or dural fistula, with few symptoms, associated with a delay in diagnosis which can alter prognosis for function and even life.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to determine characteristic signs of both types of CCF and to study their correlation with the anatomical type of vessels involved on the angiogram. The prognosis for both types of fistula was also studied.

METHOD

Retrospective single-center study, including patients with angiographically confirmed DCCF or ICCF. Demographic, clinical, and prognostic characteristics of these patients were analyzed and compared with the angiogram findings.

RESULTS

Six patients (4 DCCF and 2 ICCF) were included in this study. Mean age at diagnosis was 62.7 years in the DCCF group and 62 years in the ICCF group. Mean time until diagnosis was 7 weeks in the DCCF group and 24 weeks in the ICCF group. Signs of orbital congestion were present in 100% of patients with DCCF and absent in all patients in the ICCF group. Mean proptosis was 3.5mm in the DCCF group and 0.5 in the ICCF group. All patients had an audible bruit on auscultation. The location of the bruit was orbital in all patients with DCCF, and pretragal or jugal in 50% of patients with ICCF.

CONCLUSIONS

ICCF can impact mortality and are often underdiagnosed. The diagnostic delay observed in our study reflects the difficulties which persist in recognizing the clinical signs of this condition. ICCF must be suspected in the case of a history suggestive of CCF, even if the clinical examination appears normal. The presence of a bruit must be carefully sought, not only in the classical orbital location, but also in other facial locations as shown in our study. Our results demonstrate that there is indeed a good correlation between the site of the CCF, the location of the bruit, and the vessels involved.

摘要

引言

根据颈内动脉与海绵窦之间的交通类型,可区分出两种类型的颈动脉海绵窦瘘:直接型颈动脉海绵窦瘘(DCCF),因其具有明显的眼眶充血体征,通常诊断较为容易;间接型颈动脉海绵窦瘘(ICCF)或硬脑膜瘘,症状较少,诊断往往延迟,这可能会改变功能预后甚至危及生命。

目的

本研究的目的是确定两种类型颈动脉海绵窦瘘的特征性体征,并研究它们与血管造影所示受累血管解剖类型的相关性。同时也对两种类型瘘的预后进行了研究。

方法

回顾性单中心研究,纳入血管造影确诊为DCCF或ICCF的患者。分析这些患者的人口统计学、临床和预后特征,并与血管造影结果进行比较。

结果

本研究纳入了6例患者(4例DCCF和2例ICCF)。DCCF组诊断时的平均年龄为62.7岁,ICCF组为62岁。DCCF组诊断前的平均时间为7周,ICCF组为24周。100%的DCCF患者存在眼眶充血体征,而ICCF组所有患者均无此体征。DCCF组平均眼球突出度为3.5mm,ICCF组为0.5mm。所有患者听诊时均可闻及血管杂音。DCCF患者的血管杂音均位于眼眶,而ICCF患者中有50%的血管杂音位于耳屏前或颧部。

结论

ICCF可能影响死亡率,且常被漏诊。我们研究中观察到的诊断延迟反映了识别该疾病临床体征仍存在困难。即使临床检查看似正常,对于有提示颈动脉海绵窦瘘病史的患者也必须怀疑ICCF。必须仔细寻找血管杂音,不仅要在经典的眼眶部位,还要在我们研究中所示的其他面部部位。我们的结果表明,颈动脉海绵窦瘘的部位、血管杂音的位置与受累血管之间确实存在良好的相关性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验