[电刺激长期留针在腹腔镜胆囊切除术后镇痛中的疗效]

[Efficacy on analgesia with electric stimulation of long-term retaining needle after laparoscopic cholecystectomy].

作者信息

Yu Gui-Jie, Fu Guo-Qiang, Li Fu-Rong, Li Lian-Hong, Guo Feng, Xue Hui, He Kun, Wang Jian

出版信息

Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2014 Feb;34(2):169-72.

DOI:
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To observe the clinical effect of electric stimulation of long-term retaining needle on analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and the impacts on the post-surgical flatus time.

METHODS

Under static absorptive composite general anesthesia, 90 cases of LC were randomized into three groups, 30 cases in each one. In the control group, the analgesia was not applied after LC. In the analgesia-pumper group, the patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) was used. In the needle-retaining group, the electric acupuncture stimulator was used. The needles were inserted transversely at Riyue (GB 24), Qichong (ST 30) and Yanglingquan (GB 34) and fixed with sterile sticker. Separately, in 8 h and 24 h after surgery, the electric acupuncture stimulation with disperse-dense wave, 2 Hz/100 Hz frequency was applied continuously for 30 min. Visual analogue scale (VAS), adverse reactions such as vomiting and nausea and the postoperative flatus time in 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 36 h after surgery were observed and recorded in the three groups.

RESULTS

In 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 h after surgery, VAS scores in the needle-retaining group and the analgesia-pumper group were all lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05, P < 0.01). The analgesia effect at the above time points in the needle-retaining group was better than that in the analgesia-pumper group (all P < 0.05). There was not adverse reaction in the needle-retaining group. But there were 3 cases of somnolence, 6 cases of nausea and 3 cases of vomiting in the analgesia-pumper group, and 2 cases of nausea and 1 case of vomiting in the control group. The flatus time was quite earlier in the needle-retaining group as compared with the other two groups [(14.77 +/- 4.99) h vs (18.50 +/- 4.22) h, P < 0.01; (14.77 +/- 4.99) h vs (18.17 +/- 4.69) h, P < 0.05].

CONCLUSION

The electric stimulation of long-term retaining needle is safe and effective in analgesia after LC. It avoids the adverse reactions of analgesics and promotes postoperative flatus.

摘要

目的

观察电刺激长期留针在腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)后镇痛的临床效果及对术后排气时间的影响。

方法

90例行LC患者在静吸复合全身麻醉下随机分为三组,每组30例。对照组LC术后不给予镇痛;镇痛泵组采用患者自控静脉镇痛(PCIA);留针组采用针刺电刺激仪。针刺日月(GB 24)、气冲(ST 30)和阳陵泉(GB 34),横向进针,用无菌贴固定。术后8 h和24 h分别采用疏密波、频率2 Hz/100 Hz连续电针刺激30 min。观察并记录三组患者术后2、4、8、12、24和36 h的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、恶心呕吐等不良反应及术后排气时间。

结果

术后2、4、8、12和24 h,留针组和镇痛泵组的VAS评分均低于对照组(P < 0.05,P < 0.01)。留针组上述时间点的镇痛效果优于镇痛泵组(均P < 0.05)。留针组无不良反应。镇痛泵组有3例嗜睡、6例恶心、3例呕吐,对照组有2例恶心、1例呕吐。留针组排气时间较其他两组明显提前[(14.77 ± 4.99)h比(18.50 ± 4.22)h,P < 0.01;(14.77 ± 4.99)h比(18.17 ± 4.69)h,P < 0.05]。

结论

电刺激长期留针用于LC术后镇痛安全有效,可避免镇痛药的不良反应,促进术后排气。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索