Suppr超能文献

矢状面头部姿势的评估者内和评估者间信度:一项由物理治疗师和言语语言病理学家执行的新技术。

Intrarater and interrater reliability of sagittal head posture: a novel technique performed by a physiotherapist and a speech and language pathologist.

作者信息

Moradi Negin, Maroufi Nader, Bijankhan Mahmoud, Hosseinzadeh Nik Tahereh, Salavati Mahyar, Jalayer Toktam, Shaterzadeh Yazdi Mohammad Jafar, Ghasemi Fatemeh, Soltani Majid, Naderifar Ehsan, Mardani Najmeh, Akbari Meymanat

机构信息

Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

Department of Physical Therapy, School of Rehabilitation Science, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Voice. 2014 Nov;28(6):842.e11-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.02.014. Epub 2014 Jun 18.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Different professionals such as speech and language pathologists and voice scientists are involved in the evaluation of head and neck posture. Therefore, a reliable, time-efficient, and precise method of posture assessment is essential for use in clinical and research settings. Photogrammetry is one of the most commonly used methods to assess head and neck posture. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the intrarater reliability of the method with a large sample size and the interrater reliability by two different specialists (a physiotherapist and a speech and language pathologist).

METHOD

A total of three hundred four subjects (144 males and 160 females) aged between 18 and 28 years participated in the study. During the test session, a photograph was taken of the left-side profile of each subject in their ordinary and comfortable position. The head posture angle of each picture was calculated by two raters. The whole procedure was repeated in a retest session, 24 hours later. A total number of eight analyses were performed for each subject. The reliability was evaluated at several stages hierarchically and after confirming the reliability in each step, the next step was investigated. Paired t tests on the differences of scores obtained at all the aforementioned stages were used to ensure the absence of any systematic bias. To assess the reliability, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and the standard error of measurements (SEMs) were calculated.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the mean values of the test and the retest angles at any stage of calculating the head posture angle in both pictures by both examiners (P > 0.05). The ICC and SEM values calculated for all stages were between 0.86-0.97 and 0.52-1.53, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Systematic bias has not occurred at any stage. The ICC and SEM values calculated have demonstrated that there were appropriate relative and absolute reliabilities in all stages. This method is suggested to be used simply in research and clinical areas by different specialists.

摘要

引言

言语和语言病理学家以及嗓音科学家等不同专业人员参与头颈部姿势评估。因此,一种可靠、省时且精确的姿势评估方法对于临床和研究环境的使用至关重要。摄影测量法是评估头颈部姿势最常用的方法之一。本研究的目的是通过大样本评估该方法的评分者内信度以及由两名不同专家(一名物理治疗师和一名言语和语言病理学家)评估的评分者间信度。

方法

共有304名年龄在18至28岁之间的受试者(144名男性和160名女性)参与了该研究。在测试过程中,为每位受试者在其平常舒适的位置拍摄左侧面部照片。两名评分者计算每张照片的头部姿势角度。整个过程在24小时后的重新测试环节中重复进行。每位受试者总共进行了八次分析。在几个阶段分层评估信度,在确认每个步骤的信度后,再研究下一步。对在上述所有阶段获得的分数差异进行配对t检验,以确保不存在任何系统偏差。为评估信度,计算了组内相关系数(ICC)和测量标准误差(SEM)。

结果

在两位检查者计算两张照片中头部姿势角度的任何阶段,测试角度和重新测试角度的平均值之间均无显著差异(P>0.05)。所有阶段计算的ICC和SEM值分别在0.86 - 0.97和0.52 - 1.53之间。

结论

在任何阶段均未出现系统偏差。计算得到的ICC和SEM值表明在所有阶段都有适当的相对和绝对信度。建议不同专家在研究和临床领域简单使用此方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验