Suppr超能文献

将基本卫生产品送到最终使用者手中:补贴,但补贴多少?

Getting essential health products to their end users: subsidize, but how much?

机构信息

Department of Economics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

出版信息

Science. 2014 Sep 12;345(6202):1279-81. doi: 10.1126/science.1256973.

Abstract

Although coverage rates and health outcomes are improving, many poor people around the world still do not benefit from essential health products. An estimated two-thirds of child deaths could be prevented with increased coverage of products such as vaccines, point-of-use water treatment, iron fortification, and insecticide-treated bednets. What limits the flow of products from the producer's laboratory bench to the end users, and what can be done about it? Recent empirical research suggests a crucial role for heavy subsidies.

摘要

尽管覆盖率和健康状况都在改善,但世界上仍有许多贫困人口无法受益于基本的卫生产品。据估计,增加疫苗、即时用水处理、铁强化和经杀虫剂处理的蚊帐等产品的覆盖率,可预防三分之二的儿童死亡。是什么限制了产品从生产者的实验室走向最终用户,我们又能为此做些什么?最近的实证研究表明,高额补贴发挥了关键作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验