理解中的表面信息丢失。
Surface Information Loss in Comprehension.
作者信息
Gernsbacher Morton Ann
机构信息
University of Oregon.
出版信息
Cogn Psychol. 1985 Jul;17(3):324-363. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(85)90012-X.
Shortly after a sentence has been comprehended, information about its exact surface form (e.g., its word order) becomes less available. The present research demonstrated this phenomenon during the comprehension of nonverbal stimuli (picture stories). In Experiment 1, significantly more surface (left/right orientation) information was lost after comprehending several picture stories than just one; in Experiment 2, more was lost after comprehending an entire picture story than half of one. In Experiment 3, subjects segmented the picture stories into their constituents; in Experiment 4, significantly more surface information was lost after crossing these constituents' boundaries than before. The present research also investigated why surface information is lost. Four explanations were considered: Surface information loss is the result of performing grammatical transformations (the linguistic hypothesis), exceeding short-term memory limitations (the memory limitations hypothesis), integrating information into gist (the integration hypothesis), shifting from building one substructure to initiating another (the processing shift hypothesis). The linguistic and memory limitations hypotheses were considered inadequate; the integration and the processing shift hypotheses were tested in the last set of experiments. In Experiment 5 (using nonverbal stimuli), the predictions made by the processing shift hypothesis were confirmed; in Experiment 6 (using verbal stimuli), these results were replicated. Other implications of the processing shift hypothesis concerning surface information loss are discussed.
在一个句子被理解后不久,关于其确切表面形式(例如,词序)的信息就变得难以获取。本研究在对非语言刺激(图片故事)的理解过程中证明了这一现象。在实验1中,理解几个图片故事后比只理解一个图片故事丢失了显著更多的表面(左/右方向)信息;在实验2中,理解整个图片故事后比理解半个图片故事丢失的信息更多。在实验3中,受试者将图片故事分割成其组成部分;在实验4中,跨越这些组成部分的边界后比之前丢失了显著更多的表面信息。本研究还调查了表面信息丢失的原因。考虑了四种解释:表面信息丢失是进行语法转换的结果(语言假设)、超出短期记忆限制(记忆限制假设)、将信息整合为要点(整合假设)、从构建一个子结构转向启动另一个子结构(处理转换假设)。语言和记忆限制假设被认为不充分;整合假设和处理转换假设在最后一组实验中进行了测试。在实验5(使用非语言刺激)中,处理转换假设所做的预测得到了证实;在实验6(使用语言刺激)中,这些结果得到了重复。讨论了处理转换假设关于表面信息丢失的其他含义。