卡铂、吉西他滨和脂质体阿霉素用于恶性胸膜间皮瘤的三线化疗。
Third-line chemotherapy with carboplatin, gemcitabine and liposomised doxorubicin for malignant pleural mesothelioma.
作者信息
de Lima Vinicius Araújo B, Sørensen Jens Benn
机构信息
Department of Oncology, Finsen Centre/National University Hospital, Rigshospitalet/Copenhagen University Hospital, 9 Blegdamsvej, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark,
出版信息
Med Oncol. 2015 Feb;32(2):458. doi: 10.1007/s12032-014-0458-x. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
There is no well-defined standard third-line chemotherapy for advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). However, combination of carboplatin, liposomised doxorubicin (Caelyx) and gemcitabine (CCG regimen) has revealed noteworthy activity when used as first-line treatment. The aim of this study is to assess efficacy and toxicity profile for patients with MPM receiving CCG regimen as a third-line treatment. Carboplatin (AUC 5), Caelyx (30 mg/m(2)) and Gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)) day 1, together with Gemcitabine (800 mg/m(2)) day 8, were given in up to six cycles. Patients were unresectable, PS 0-2, and had previously received a first-line platinum-based regimen and either vinorelbine or pemetrexed as second line. Response to treatment was assessed by CT scan using Modified RECIST criteria for mesothelioma. Forty-three patients were treated between 2010 and 2014. Median age was 67 years (47-82), 72 % males, and 79 % had previous asbestos exposure. Ninety per cent had PS 0-1, 58 % had epitheloid subtype and 63 % IMIG stage IV. First-line treatment was platinum and pemetrexed in 42 cases. Second-line treatment was vinorelbine in 42 cases and pemetrexed in one patient. Median lead time from cessation of second-line treatment to start of third CCG was 1 month. Twenty-eight per cent of the patients received six cycles, while treatment was postponed due to toxicities, mainly haematological, in 56 % of cases. No toxicity-related deaths occurred. Partial response (PR) occurred in 14 %, and disease control rate (DCR) was 60 %. Medians of overall survival (OS) from diagnosis and from start of CCG treatment were 25.2 months (18.4-31.5 months) and 6.8 months (5.4-8.4 months), respectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.1 months (1.7-4.5 months). Third-line CCG revealed a noteworthy efficacy with a DCR of 60.4 %. It was, however, associated with considerable haematological toxicity. Less toxic and more active treatment options are clearly needed.
对于晚期恶性胸膜间皮瘤(MPM),尚无明确界定的标准三线化疗方案。然而,卡铂、脂质体阿霉素(楷莱)和吉西他滨联合使用(CCG方案)作为一线治疗时已显示出显著活性。本研究的目的是评估接受CCG方案作为三线治疗的MPM患者的疗效和毒性特征。卡铂(曲线下面积5)、楷莱(30mg/m²)和吉西他滨(1000mg/m²)于第1天给药,同时吉西他滨(800mg/m²)于第8天给药,共进行多达六个周期。患者不可切除,体能状态为0 - 2,既往接受过一线铂类方案治疗,二线治疗为长春瑞滨或培美曲塞。采用改良的RECIST标准对间皮瘤进行CT扫描评估治疗反应。2010年至2014年间对43例患者进行了治疗。中位年龄为67岁(47 - 82岁),72%为男性,79%既往有石棉暴露史。90%的患者体能状态为0 - 1,58%为上皮样亚型,63%为国际间皮瘤研究组(IMIG)IV期。42例患者一线治疗为铂类和培美曲塞。42例患者二线治疗为长春瑞滨,1例患者为培美曲塞。从二线治疗结束到开始三线CCG治疗的中位间隔时间为1个月。28%的患者接受了六个周期的治疗,56%的病例因毒性反应(主要是血液学毒性)而推迟治疗。未发生与毒性相关的死亡。部分缓解(PR)率为14%,疾病控制率(DCR)为60%。从诊断开始和从CCG治疗开始的总生存期(OS)中位数分别为25.2个月(18.4 - 31.5个月)和6.8个月(5.4 - 8.4个月)。无进展生存期(PFS)为4.1个月(1.7 - 4.5个月)。三线CCG显示出显著疗效,DCR为60.4%。然而,它与相当大的血液学毒性相关。显然需要毒性更小且活性更高的治疗选择。