• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

至少16个淋巴结清扫数目会影响胃癌根治性切除术后的生存率吗?

Does a minimum number of 16 retrieved nodes affect survival in curatively resected gastric cancer?

作者信息

Biondi A, D'Ugo D, Cananzi F C M, Papa V, Borasi A, Sicoli F, Degiuli M, Doglietto G, Persiani R

机构信息

General Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, "A. Gemelli" University Hospital, Catholic University of Rome, Largo A. Gemelli 8, Rome 00167, Italy.

Surgical Oncology Unit - Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano 20089, MI, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jun;41(6):779-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.03.227. Epub 2015 Apr 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2015.03.227
PMID:25899981
Abstract

BACKGROUND

According to the TNM classification, the analysis of 16 or more lymph nodes is required for the appropriate staging of gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether this number of resected lymph nodes also affects survival.

METHODS

This was a multicenter retrospective study based on an analysis of 992 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent curative resection between January 1980 and December 2009. Patients were classified according to the number of resected lymph nodes (<16 and ≥16 lymph nodes), the anatomical extent of lymph node dissection (D2 vs. D1), and the staging criteria of the seventh edition of the UICC/AJCC TNM staging system. Survival estimates were determined by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Based on the univariate and multivariate analyses, the resection of 16 or more lymph nodes was associated with significantly better survival [p = 0.002; hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval [CI]): 0.519 (0.345-0.780)]. Patients with a lymph node count <16 had a significantly worse survival rate than patients with a lymph node count ≥16 in the pN0 (p = 0.001), pN1 (p = 0.007) and pN2 (p = 0.001) stages. In the majority of cases, ≥16 lymph nodes were retrieved when D2 dissection was performed.

CONCLUSIONS

In gastric cancer the retrieval of less than 16 lymph nodes may cause inaccurate staging and/or inadequate treatment, thus affecting survival rates. These patients should be considered a high-risk group for stage migration and worse survival compared with those who have a retrieval of more than 16 lymph nodes.

摘要

背景

根据TNM分类,胃癌的准确分期需要分析16个或更多淋巴结。本研究的目的是评估切除的淋巴结数量是否也会影响生存率。

方法

这是一项多中心回顾性研究,基于对1980年1月至2009年12月期间接受根治性切除的992例胃腺癌患者的分析。根据切除的淋巴结数量(<16个和≥16个淋巴结)、淋巴结清扫的解剖范围(D2与D1)以及UICC/AJCC TNM分期系统第七版的分期标准对患者进行分类。通过单因素和多因素分析确定生存估计值。

结果

基于单因素和多因素分析,切除16个或更多淋巴结与显著更好的生存率相关[p = 0.002;风险比(HR)(95%置信区间[CI]):0.519(0.345 - 0.780)]。在pN0(p = 0.001)、pN1(p = 0.007)和pN2(p = 0.001)期,淋巴结计数<16的患者的生存率明显低于淋巴结计数≥16的患者。在大多数情况下,进行D2清扫时可获取≥16个淋巴结。

结论

在胃癌中,获取少于16个淋巴结可能导致分期不准确和/或治疗不充分,从而影响生存率。与获取超过16个淋巴结的患者相比,这些患者应被视为分期迁移和生存较差的高危人群。

相似文献

1
Does a minimum number of 16 retrieved nodes affect survival in curatively resected gastric cancer?至少16个淋巴结清扫数目会影响胃癌根治性切除术后的生存率吗?
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jun;41(6):779-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.03.227. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
2
Lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer after curative resection (R0) regardless of the examined number of lymph nodes.无论检查的淋巴结数量多少,淋巴结比率都是可切除(R0)胃癌患者的独立预后因素。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2013 Aug;36(4):325-30. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e318246b4e9.
3
Prognosis for gastric carcinomas with an insufficient number of examined negative lymph nodes.胃腺癌中检查到的阴性淋巴结数量不足的预后。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Mar;40(3):358-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.08.027. Epub 2013 Sep 8.
4
Comparison of the staging of regional lymph nodes using the sixth and seventh editions of the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification system for the evaluation of overall survival in gastric cancer patients: findings of a case-control analysis involving a single institution in China.比较第六版和第七版肿瘤-淋巴结-转移(TNM)分期系统在评估胃癌患者总生存期中区域淋巴结分期的作用:中国单中心病例对照研究结果。
Surgery. 2014 Jul;156(1):64-74. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.03.020. Epub 2014 Mar 16.
5
[Comparison of the prognostic value of UICC and JGCA lymph node staging criteria for gastric cancer].[UICC与JGCA胃癌淋巴结分期标准的预后价值比较]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2008 May;30(5):376-80.
6
The prognostic value of N-ratio in patients with gastric cancer: validation in a large, multicenter series.N 比值在胃癌患者中的预后价值:在大型多中心队列中的验证
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008 Feb;34(2):159-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2007.04.018. Epub 2007 Jun 13.
7
Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph nodes ratio in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma after curative gastrectomy.根治性胃切除术后胃腺癌患者转移淋巴结比率的预后意义
Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(10):1874-8.
8
The lymph node ratio as a prognostic factor for gastric cancer.淋巴结比率作为胃癌的预后因素。
Acta Oncol. 2013 Nov;52(8):1751-9. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2012.754991. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
9
The prognostic value of different node staging systems in patients with ≤15 lymph nodes following surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma.不同淋巴结分期系统对胃腺癌手术后淋巴结≤15枚患者的预后价值。
Acta Chir Belg. 2018 Feb;118(1):1-6. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2017.1346036. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
10
[Prognostic factors of lymph node-negative metastasis gastric cancer].[淋巴结阴性转移性胃癌的预后因素]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Feb 25;20(2):190-194.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of different lymph node classification systems as independent prognosticators in gastric signet ring cell carcinoma.评估不同淋巴结分类系统在胃印戒细胞癌中作为独立预后指标的情况。
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug 26;23(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03978-w.
2
The Association between the Number of Retrieved Lymph Nodes and Survival in Gastric Cancer Surgery: A Dutch Population-Based Study.胃癌手术中淋巴结清扫数量与生存的关联:一项基于荷兰人群的研究
Dig Surg. 2025 May 19:1-14. doi: 10.1159/000546436.
3
[Evidence for the extent and oncological benefit of lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer].
[胃癌淋巴结清扫范围及肿瘤学获益的证据]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2025 Apr;96(4):281-287. doi: 10.1007/s00104-024-02198-4. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
4
Risk factor analysis and establishment of a predictive model for complications of elderly advanced gastric cancer with Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ II grade.高龄晚期胃癌患者 Clavien-Dindo 分级≥Ⅱ级并发症的危险因素分析及预测模型的建立。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):1185. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12965-5.
5
The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO): Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer, 2023.中国临床肿瘤学会(CSCO):胃癌诊断与治疗临床实践指南,2023 年版。
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2024 Jan;44(1):127-172. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12516. Epub 2023 Dec 31.
6
Development and validation of a novel nomogram for postoperative overall survival of patients with primary gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma: a population study based on SEER database.基于 SEER 数据库的人群研究:开发和验证原发性胃印戒细胞癌患者术后总生存的新型列线图
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Sep;149(11):8593-8603. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-04796-x. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
7
Signaling pathways and therapeutic interventions in gastric cancer.胃癌中的信号通路和治疗干预措施。
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022 Oct 8;7(1):358. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-01190-w.
8
External Validation of a Nomogram Developed for Predicting Overall Survival in Gastric Cancer Patients with Insufficient Number of Examined Lymph Nodes.用于预测检查淋巴结数量不足的胃癌患者总生存期的列线图的外部验证
Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2022 Mar 28;56(1):137-144. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2021.47587. eCollection 2022.
9
Does lymph node ratio (metastasis/total lymph node count) affect survival and prognosis in gastric cancer?淋巴结转移率(转移/总淋巴结计数)是否影响胃癌的生存和预后?
Saudi Med J. 2022 Feb;43(2):139-145. doi: 10.15537/smj.2022.43.2.20210464.
10
Endoscopic Versus Surgical Therapy for Early Esophagogastric Junction Adenocarcinoma Based on Lymph Node Metastasis Risk: A Population-Based Analysis.基于淋巴结转移风险的早期食管胃交界腺癌的内镜治疗与手术治疗:一项基于人群的分析
Front Oncol. 2021 Dec 17;11:716470. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.716470. eCollection 2021.