为患有慢性溃疡的住院患者创建治疗社区的步骤:来自贝宁阿拉达布氏菌溃疡治疗医院的经验教训。
Steps Toward Creating A Therapeutic Community for Inpatients Suffering from Chronic Ulcers: Lessons from Allada Buruli Ulcer Treatment Hospital in Benin.
作者信息
Amoussouhoui Arnaud Setondji, Johnson Roch Christian, Sopoh Ghislain Emmanuel, Agbo Ines Elvire, Aoulou Paulin, Houezo Jean-Gabin, Tingbe-Azalou Albert, Boyer Micah, Nichter Mark
机构信息
Faculté des Lettres Arts et Sciences humaines, Université d'Abomey Calavi, Abomey Calavi, Benin.
Centre de Diagnostic et de Traitement de l'Ulcère de Buruli, Allada, Benin.
出版信息
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Jul 1;10(7):e0004602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004602. eCollection 2016 Jul.
BACKGROUND
Reducing social distance between hospital staff and patients and establishing clear lines of communication is a major challenge when providing in-patient care for people afflicted by Buruli ulcer (BU) and chronic ulcers. Research on hospitals as therapeutic communities is virtually non-existent in Africa and is currently being called for by medical anthropologists working in the field of health service and policy planning. This paper describes a pioneering attempt to establish a therapeutic community for patients suffering from BU and other chronic ulcers requiring long term hospital care in Benin.
METHODS
A six-month pilot project was undertaken with the objectives of establishing a therapeutic community and evaluating its impact on practitioner and patient relations. The project was designed and implemented by a team of social scientists working in concert with the current and previous director of a hospital serving patients suffering from advanced stage BU and other chronic ulcers. Qualitative research initially investigated patients' understanding of their illness and its treatment, identified questions patients had about their hospitalization, and ascertained their level of social support. Newly designed question-answer health education sessions were developed. Following these hospital wide education sessions, open forums were held each week to provide an opportunity for patients and hospital staff to express concerns and render sources of discontent transparent. Patient group representatives then met with hospital staff to problem solve issues in a non-confrontational manner. Psychosocial support for individual patients was provided in a second intervention which took the form of drop-in counseling sessions with social scientists trained to serve as therapy facilitators and culture brokers.
RESULTS
Interviews with patients revealed that most patients had very little information about the identity of their illness and the duration of their treatment. This knowledge gap surprised clinic staff members, who assumed someone had provided this information. Individual counseling and weekly education sessions corrected this information gap and reduced patient concerns about their treatment and the status of their healing process. This led to positive changes in staff-patient interactions. There was widespread consensus among both patients and staff that the quality of communication had increased significantly. Open forums providing an opportunity for patients and staff to air grievances were likewise popular and patient representative meetings resulted in productive problem solving supported by the hospital administration. Some systemic problems, however, remained persistent challenges. Patients with ulcers unrelated to BU questioned why BU patients were receiving preferential treatment, given special medicines, and charged less for their care. The idea of subsidized treatment for one disease and not another was hard to justify, especially given that BU is not contagious.
CONCLUSION
This pilot project illustrates the basic principles necessary for transforming long term residential hospitals into therapeutic communities. Although the focus of this case study was patients suffering from chronic ulcers, the model presented is relevant for other types of patients with cultural adaptation.
背景
在为布氏溃疡(BU)患者和慢性溃疡患者提供住院护理时,减少医院工作人员与患者之间的社会距离并建立明确的沟通渠道是一项重大挑战。在非洲,关于医院作为治疗社区的研究几乎不存在,而从事卫生服务和政策规划领域工作的医学人类学家目前正在呼吁开展此类研究。本文描述了在贝宁为患有布氏溃疡和其他需要长期住院治疗的慢性溃疡患者建立治疗社区的开创性尝试。
方法
开展了一个为期六个月的试点项目,目标是建立一个治疗社区并评估其对从业者与患者关系的影响。该项目由一组社会科学家团队设计并实施,他们与一家为晚期布氏溃疡患者和其他慢性溃疡患者提供服务的医院的现任及前任院长合作。定性研究首先调查了患者对其疾病及其治疗的理解,确定患者对住院治疗存在的疑问,并确定他们的社会支持水平。随后开展了新设计的问答式健康教育课程。在全院范围的教育课程之后,每周举行公开论坛,为患者和医院工作人员提供一个表达关切并使不满根源透明化的机会。然后患者群体代表与医院工作人员会面,以非对抗的方式解决问题。在第二项干预措施中,为个体患者提供心理社会支持,采取的形式是与接受过培训担任治疗促进者和文化中介的社会科学家进行即席咨询会议。
结果
对患者的访谈显示,大多数患者对自己疾病的特征和治疗时长了解甚少。这一知识差距让临床工作人员感到惊讶,他们原以为有人已经提供了这些信息。个体咨询和每周的教育课程弥补了这一信息差距,并减轻了患者对治疗及其愈合过程状况的担忧。这导致了医患互动的积极变化。患者和工作人员普遍达成共识,即沟通质量有了显著提高。为患者和工作人员提供表达不满机会的公开论坛同样受到欢迎,患者代表会议在医院管理部门的支持下有效地解决了问题。然而,一些系统性问题仍然是持续存在的挑战。患有与布氏溃疡无关溃疡的患者质疑为什么布氏溃疡患者能得到优先治疗、获得特殊药物且治疗费用更低。一种疾病有补贴治疗而另一种没有,这种想法很难说得通,尤其是考虑到布氏溃疡不具有传染性。
结论
这个试点项目阐明了将长期住院医院转变为治疗社区所需的基本原则。尽管本案例研究的重点是慢性溃疡患者,但所呈现的模式与其他需要文化适应的患者类型相关。