系统评价患者报告结局测量(PROMs)在类风湿关节炎疾病活动评估中的应用。

Systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for assessing disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis.

机构信息

Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Department of IQ Healthcare , Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences , Nijmegen , The Netherlands.

出版信息

RMD Open. 2016 Aug 18;2(2):e000202. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000202. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Patient assessment of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may be useful in clinical practice, offering a patient-friendly, location independent, and a time-efficient and cost-efficient means of monitoring the disease. The objective of this study was to identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to assess disease activity in RA and to evaluate the measurement properties of these measures. Systematic literature searches were performed in the PubMed and EMBASE databases to identify articles reporting on clinimetric development or evaluation of PROM-based instruments to monitor disease activity in patients with RA. 2 reviewers independently selected articles for review and assessed their methodological quality based on the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) recommendations. A total of 424 abstracts were retrieved for review. Of these abstracts, 56 were selected for reviewing the full article and 34 articles, presenting 17 different PROMs, were finally included. Identified were: Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index (RADAI), RADAI-5, Patient-based Disease Activity Score (PDAS) I & II, Patient-derived Disease Activity Score with 28-joint counts (Pt-DAS28), Patient-derived Simplified Disease Activity Index (Pt-SDAI), Global Arthritis Score (GAS), Patient Activity Score (PAS) I & II, Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID) 2-5, Patient Reported Outcome-index (PRO-index) continuous (C) & majority (M), Patient Reported Outcome CLinical ARthritis Activity (PRO-CLARA). The quality of reports varied from poor to good. Typically 5 out of 10 clinimetric domains were covered in the validations of the different instruments. The quality and extent of clinimetric validation varied among PROMs of RA disease activity. The Pt-DAS28, RADAI, RADAI-5 and RAPID 3 had the strongest and most extensive validation. The measurement properties least reported and in need of more evidence were: reliability, measurement error, cross-cultural validity and interpretability of measures.

摘要

患者对类风湿关节炎(RA)疾病活动的评估在临床实践中可能是有用的,它提供了一种患者友好、独立于地点、省时和高效的监测疾病的方法。本研究的目的是确定用于评估 RA 疾病活动的患者报告结局(PROM),并评估这些测量工具的测量特性。系统地在 PubMed 和 EMBASE 数据库中进行文献检索,以确定报告关于基于 PROM 的工具的临床计量学开发或评估的文章,以监测 RA 患者的疾病活动。2 名审查员独立选择文章进行审查,并根据共识基础健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)建议评估其方法学质量。共检索到 424 篇摘要进行审查。其中,56 篇摘要被选为全文审查,最终纳入 34 篇文章,提出了 17 种不同的 PROM。确定的有:类风湿关节炎疾病活动指数(RADAI)、RADAI-5、基于患者的疾病活动评分(PDAS)I 和 II、基于患者的 28 个关节计数的疾病活动评分(Pt-DAS28)、基于患者的简化疾病活动指数(Pt-SDAI)、全球关节炎评分(GAS)、患者活动评分(PAS)I 和 II、常规评估患者指数数据(RAPID)2-5、患者报告结局指数(PRO-index)连续(C)和多数(M)、患者报告结局 CLINical ARthritis 活动(PRO-CLARA)。报告的质量从差到好不等。通常,不同仪器验证中涵盖了 10 个临床计量域中的 5 个。RA 疾病活动的 PROM 的临床计量验证的质量和范围各不相同。Pt-DAS28、RADAI、RADAI-5 和 RAPID 3 具有最强和最广泛的验证。报告最少和需要更多证据的测量特性是:可靠性、测量误差、跨文化有效性和测量的可解释性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea08/5013514/66817f2c9ef6/rmdopen2015000202f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索