自体造血细胞移植后常规监测成像对弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者结局的影响

Impact of Routine Surveillance Imaging on Outcomes of Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma After Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

作者信息

Epperla Narendranath, Shah Namrata, Hamadani Mehdi, Richardson Kristin, Kapke Jonathan T, Patel Asmita, Teegavarapu Sravanthi P, Carrum George, Hari Parameswaran N, Pingali Sai R, Karmali Reem, Fenske Timothy S

机构信息

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.

Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.

出版信息

Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2016 Dec;16(12):672-678. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2016.08.018. Epub 2016 Aug 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

For patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) is commonly used. After auto-HCT, DLBCL patients are often monitored with surveillance imaging. However, there is little evidence to support this practice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a multicenter retrospective study of DLBCL patients who underwent auto-HCT (n = 160), who experienced complete remission after transplantation, and who then underwent surveillance imaging. Of these, only 45 patients experienced relapse after day +100 after auto-HCT, with relapse detected by routine imaging in 32 (71%) and relapse detected clinically in 13 (29%).

RESULTS

Baseline patient characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Comparing the radiographic and clinically detected relapse groups, the median time from diagnosis to auto-HCT (389 days vs. 621 days, P = .06) and the median follow-up after auto-HCT (2464 days vs. 1593 days P = .60) were similar. The median time to relapse after auto-HCT was 191 days in radiographically detected relapses compared to 492 days in clinically detected relapses (P = .35), and median postrelapse survival was 359 days in such patients compared to 123 days in patients with clinically detected relapse (P = .36). However, the median posttransplantation overall survival was not significantly different for patients with relapse detected by routine imaging versus relapse detected clinically (643 vs. 586 days, P = .68).

CONCLUSION

A majority (71%) of DLBCL relapses after auto-HCT are detected by routine surveillance imaging. Overall, there appears to be limited utility for routine imaging after auto-HCT except in select cases where earlier detection and salvage therapy with allogeneic HCT is a potential option.

摘要

背景

对于复发或难治性弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者,自体造血细胞移植(auto-HCT)是常用的治疗方法。自体造血细胞移植后,DLBCL患者常通过监测影像学进行监测。然而,几乎没有证据支持这种做法。

患者和方法

我们对接受自体造血细胞移植(n = 160)、移植后实现完全缓解并随后接受监测影像学检查的DLBCL患者进行了一项多中心回顾性研究。其中,只有45例患者在自体造血细胞移植后第100天之后出现复发,32例(71%)通过常规影像学检查发现复发,13例(29%)通过临床检查发现复发。

结果

两组患者的基线特征相似。比较影像学检查和临床检查发现的复发组,从诊断到自体造血细胞移植的中位时间(389天对621天,P = 0.06)以及自体造血细胞移植后的中位随访时间(2464天对1593天,P = 0.60)相似。自体造血细胞移植后,影像学检查发现复发的患者复发的中位时间为191天,而临床检查发现复发的患者为492天(P = 0.35),此类患者复发后的中位生存期为359天,而临床检查发现复发的患者为123天(P = 0.36)。然而,常规影像学检查发现复发的患者与临床检查发现复发的患者移植后的中位总生存期无显著差异(643天对586天,P = 0.68)。

结论

自体造血细胞移植后,大多数(71%)DLBCL复发是通过常规监测影像学检查发现的。总体而言,自体造血细胞移植后常规影像学检查的作用似乎有限,除非在某些特定情况下,早期检测并采用异基因造血细胞移植进行挽救治疗是一种可能的选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索