• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哪些因素与社会经济地位不利的吸烟者的戒烟有关?一项关于戒烟辅助手段和戒烟方法使用情况的横断面调查。

What factors are associated with abstinence amongst socioeconomically disadvantaged smokers? A cross-sectional survey of use of cessation aids and quitting approach.

机构信息

School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Hunter Medical Research Institute, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.

Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour and Health Behaviour Research Group, Hunter Medical Research Institute, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018 Feb;37(2):170-179. doi: 10.1111/dar.12561. Epub 2017 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1111/dar.12561
PMID:28616900
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS

This study aimed to compare current and ex-smokers' sociodemographic and psychosocial characteristics, use of cessation aids and abrupt versus gradual quitting approaches.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A cross-sectional survey of financially disadvantaged adults attending a community service organisation was conducted in New South Wales, Australia, between February 2012 and December 2013. Sociodemographic and psychosocial factors, use of cessation aids and gradual versus abrupt quit approach were assessed. χ tests and logistic regression compared characteristics of current and ex-smokers.

RESULTS

Of 905 individuals who completed the survey, 639 (71%) were current smokers and 107 (12%) were ex-smokers. Ex-smokers were older [odds ratio (OR) = 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.01, 1.05], had higher odds of being female (OR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.06, 2.65), lower odds of being financially stressed (OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.76, 0.99), lower odds of anxiety and depression symptoms (OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.84, 0.98) and lower odds of having friends and family who were smokers (ORs ranged from 0.30-0.43). Ex-smokers had lower odds of using cessation aids and higher odds of reporting abrupt quitting during their last quit attempt (OR = 4.48, 95% CI = 2.66, 7.54).

CONCLUSIONS

Lower levels of disadvantage, less smoking in social networks, less use of cessation aids and abrupt (vs. gradual) quitting approaches were associated with being an ex-smoker. Lower use of evidence based methods to quit by disadvantaged ex-smokers requires further exploration. [Twyman L, Bonevski B, Paul C, Bryant J, West R, Siahpush M, D'este C, Oldmeadow C, Palazzi K. What factors are associated with abstinence amongst socioeconomically disadvantaged smokers? A cross-sectional survey of use of cessation aids and quitting approach. Drug Alcohol Rev 2017;00:000-000].

摘要

引言和目的

本研究旨在比较当前吸烟者和已戒烟者的社会人口学和心理社会特征、戒烟辅助手段的使用情况以及突然戒烟与逐渐戒烟方法。

方法

2012 年 2 月至 2013 年 12 月,在澳大利亚新南威尔士州的一个社区服务组织中,对经济困难的成年人进行了一项横断面调查。评估了社会人口学和心理社会因素、戒烟辅助手段的使用情况以及逐渐戒烟与突然戒烟方法。χ检验和逻辑回归比较了当前吸烟者和已戒烟者的特征。

结果

在完成调查的 905 人中,639 人(71%)为当前吸烟者,107 人(12%)为已戒烟者。与当前吸烟者相比,已戒烟者年龄更大[优势比(OR)=1.03,95%置信区间(CI)=1.01,1.05]、女性比例更高(OR=1.67,95%CI=1.06,2.65)、经济压力较小(OR=0.87,95%CI=0.76,0.99)、焦虑和抑郁症状较轻(OR=0.91,95%CI=0.84,0.98)、吸烟的朋友和家人较少(OR 范围为 0.30-0.43)。与当前吸烟者相比,已戒烟者使用戒烟辅助手段的比例较低,且在最近一次戒烟尝试中突然戒烟的比例较高(OR=4.48,95%CI=2.66,7.54)。

结论

较少的劣势、社交网络中较少的吸烟、较少使用戒烟辅助手段以及突然(而非逐渐)戒烟与成为已戒烟者有关。需要进一步探讨经济劣势的已戒烟者对基于证据的戒烟方法的使用较少的原因。

相似文献

1
What factors are associated with abstinence amongst socioeconomically disadvantaged smokers? A cross-sectional survey of use of cessation aids and quitting approach.哪些因素与社会经济地位不利的吸烟者的戒烟有关?一项关于戒烟辅助手段和戒烟方法使用情况的横断面调查。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018 Feb;37(2):170-179. doi: 10.1111/dar.12561. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
2
A Proactive Smoking Cessation Intervention for Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Smokers: The Role of Smoking-Related Stigma.一项针对社会经济地位不利的吸烟者的主动戒烟干预措施:与吸烟相关的污名的作用。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 Feb 7;20(3):286-294. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx085.
3
Comparing socially disadvantaged smokers who agree and decline to participate in a randomised smoking cessation trial.比较同意和拒绝参与随机戒烟试验的社会弱势吸烟者。
BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 14;5(9):e008419. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008419.
4
A cross-sectional analysis of ex-smokers and characteristics associated with quitting smoking: The Polish Norwegian Study (PONS).戒烟者及其戒烟相关特征的横断面分析:波兰挪威研究(PONS)。
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2019 Mar;28(2):115-123. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000429.
5
Does Smoking Intensity Predict Cessation Rates? A Study of Light-Intermittent, Light-Daily, and Heavy Smokers Enrolled in Two Telephone-Based Counseling Interventions.吸烟强度是否可预测戒烟率?基于电话咨询的两种干预措施中,轻度间歇性、轻度每日和重度吸烟者的研究。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Mar 16;22(3):423-430. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty257.
6
A pilot randomised trial to assess the methods and procedures for evaluating the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Exercise Assisted Reduction then Stop (EARS) among disadvantaged smokers.一项评估运动辅助戒烟(EARS)对弱势吸烟者的临床效果和成本效益的方法和程序的初步随机试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Jan;18(4):1-324. doi: 10.3310/hta18040.
7
Living with Smoker(s) and Smoking Cessation in Chinese Adult Smokers: Cross-Sectional and Prospective Evidence from Hong Kong Population Health Survey.与吸烟者共同生活和中国成年吸烟者戒烟:来自香港健康调查的横断面和前瞻性证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jan 5;15(1):74. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15010074.
8
What characterises smokers who quit without using help? A study of users and non-users of cessation support among successful ex-smokers.那些不借助帮助就成功戒烟的吸烟者有什么特点?一项针对成功戒烟者中戒烟支持使用者和非使用者的研究。
Tob Control. 2015 Nov;24(6):556-61. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051484. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
9
To Text or Not to Text? Technology-based Cessation Communication Preferences among Urban, Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Smokers.是否发短信?城市中社会经济地位处于劣势的吸烟者对基于技术的戒烟交流方式的偏好。
Ethn Dis. 2018 Jul 12;28(3):161-168. doi: 10.18865/ed.28.3.161. eCollection 2018 Summer.
10
Factors motivating smoking cessation: a cross-sectional study in a lower-middle-income country.促使戒烟的因素:中低收入国家的横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 18;21(1):1419. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11477-2.