残疾性慢性疼痛的种族和社会经济差异:来自健康与退休研究的发现。

Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Disabling Chronic Pain: Findings From the Health and Retirement Study.

机构信息

Center for Managing Chronic Disease, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Department of Sociology and Gerontology and Scripps Gerontology Center, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio.

出版信息

J Pain. 2017 Dec;18(12):1459-1467. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Jul 29.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

The U.S. National Pain Strategy calls for increased population research on "high-impact chronic pain" (ie, longstanding pain that substantially limits participation in daily activities). Using data from the nationally-representative Health and Retirement Study (HRS), we investigated the prevalence of high-impact chronic pain in U.S. adults older than age 50 overall and within population subgroups. We also explored sociodemographic variation in pain-related disability within specific activity domains. Data are from a subsample of HRS respondents (n = 1,925) who were randomly selected for a supplementary pain module in 2010. Our outcome was operationalized as pain duration of ≥7 months and a disability rating of ≥7 (0-10 scale) in at least 1 domain: family/home, leisure, social activities, work, or basic activities. Overall, 8.2% (95% confidence interval = 6.7-10.1%) of adults older than age 50 met criteria for high-impact chronic pain. This proportion rose to 17.1% (95% confidence interval = 12.3-23.4%) among individuals in the lowest wealth quartile. Prevalence differences according to education, race/ethnicity, and age were not significant. Arthritis and depression were significantly associated with high-impact pain in multivariable analysis. Among adults with any chronic pain, African American and individuals in the lowest wealth quartile reported more pain-related disability across activity domains.

PERSPECTIVE

High-impact chronic pain is unequally distributed among midlife and older U.S. adults. Efforts to reduce the burden of disabling chronic pain should prioritize socioeconomically vulnerable groups, who may have the least access to multimodal pain treatment to improve function.

摘要

未加标签

美国国家疼痛策略呼吁增加对“高影响慢性疼痛”(即长期限制日常活动参与的疼痛)的人群研究。我们利用全国代表性健康与退休研究(HRS)的数据,调查了美国 50 岁以上成年人中高影响慢性疼痛的总体患病率和人群亚组内的患病率。我们还探讨了特定活动领域内与疼痛相关的残疾在社会人口统计学方面的差异。数据来自 HRS 受访者的一个子样本(n=1925),他们在 2010 年被随机选择参加补充疼痛模块。我们的结果是根据至少一个领域(家庭/家庭、休闲、社会活动、工作或基本活动)的疼痛持续时间≥7 个月和残疾评分≥7(0-10 分)来确定的。总体而言,50 岁以上成年人中有 8.2%(95%置信区间为 6.7-10.1%)符合高影响慢性疼痛的标准。在财富最低的四分之一个体中,这一比例上升到 17.1%(95%置信区间为 12.3-23.4%)。根据教育、种族/民族和年龄的差异,患病率没有显著差异。关节炎和抑郁症在多变量分析中与高影响疼痛显著相关。在有任何慢性疼痛的成年人中,非裔美国人和财富最低的四分之一个体在各个活动领域报告的疼痛相关残疾更多。

观点

高影响慢性疼痛在中年和老年美国成年人中分布不均。减少致残性慢性疼痛负担的努力应优先考虑社会经济弱势群体,他们可能最缺乏改善功能的多模式疼痛治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索