与新辅助长疗程放化疗相比,术前序贯短疗程放疗联合FOLFOX化疗改善直肠癌患者的转移和无病生存率:配对分析结果

Improved Metastasis- and Disease-Free Survival With Preoperative Sequential Short-Course Radiation Therapy and FOLFOX Chemotherapy for Rectal Cancer Compared With Neoadjuvant Long-Course Chemoradiotherapy: Results of a Matched Pair Analysis.

作者信息

Markovina Stephanie, Youssef Fady, Roy Amit, Aggarwal Sonya, Khwaja Shariq, DeWees Todd, Tan Benjamin, Hunt Steven, Myerson Robert J, Chang Daniel T, Parikh Parag J, Olsen Jeffrey R

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; Siteman Cancer Center, 4921 Parkview Place, St. Louis, Missouri.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Oct 1;99(2):417-426. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.05.048. Epub 2017 Jun 6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare treatment and toxicity outcomes between a phase 2 institutional trial of near total neoadjuvant therapy (nTNT) for locally advanced rectal cancer and a similar historical control cohort treated at Washington University in St. Louis with the current US standard of care, defined as neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT), total mesorectal excision (TME), and adjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy; to expand the comparison to an additional institution, patients treated with similar NCRT at Stanford University were included.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Sixty-nine patients with cT3-4N0-2M0 rectal adenocarcinoma enrolled on the Washington University in St. Louis phase 2 study of nTNT were included for analysis. Patients treated at the same institution with conventional NCRT and adjuvant FOLFOX were matched for exact cTNM stage. Forty-one patients treated with NCRT at Stanford University were included in a second analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test was used to compare local control, distant metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 49 and 54 months for nTNT and NCRT, respectively. Pathologic complete response and T-downstaging rates were 28% versus 16% (P=.21) and 75% versus 41% (P<.001) in the nTNT and NCRT cohorts, respectively. Three-year disease-free survival (85% vs 68%, P=.032) was significantly better in the nTNT group. Actuarial 3-year local control (92% vs 96%, P=.36) and overall survival (96% vs 88%, P=.67) were similar. The Stanford cohort had significantly lower clinical stage. After controlling for clinical stage, age, tumor location, institution, and number of chemotherapy cycles, nTNT treatment remained significantly associated with lower risk of recurrence (P=.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with nTNT had higher T-downstaging and superior distant metastasis-free survival and disease-free survival compared with conventional NCRT when matched for tumor location and exact cTNM stage. Near total neoadjuvant therapy remained a significant multivariate predictor for improved outcome when including patients treated with NCRT at another institution.

摘要

目的

比较局部晚期直肠癌新辅助治疗(nTNT)的2期机构试验与在圣路易斯华盛顿大学接受治疗的类似历史对照队列(采用当前美国标准治疗,即新辅助放化疗(NCRT)、全直肠系膜切除术(TME)和辅助性FOLFOX化疗)之间的治疗和毒性结果;将比较范围扩大至另一机构,纳入在斯坦福大学接受类似NCRT治疗的患者。

方法和材料

纳入圣路易斯华盛顿大学nTNT 2期研究中登记的69例cT3 - 4N0 - 2M0直肠腺癌患者进行分析。在同一机构接受传统NCRT和辅助性FOLFOX治疗的患者按精确的cTNM分期进行匹配。在第二次分析中纳入了41例在斯坦福大学接受NCRT治疗的患者。采用Kaplan - Meier分析和对数秩检验比较局部控制、无远处转移生存期、无病生存期和总生存期。

结果

nTNT组和NCRT组的中位随访时间分别为49个月和54个月。nTNT组和NCRT组的病理完全缓解率和T降期率分别为28%对16%(P = 0.21)和75%对41%(P < 0.001)。nTNT组的3年无病生存期(85%对68%,P = 0.032)显著更好。精算3年局部控制率(92%对96%,P = 0.36)和总生存率(96%对88%,P = 0.67)相似。斯坦福队列的临床分期显著更低。在控制临床分期、年龄、肿瘤位置、机构和化疗周期数后,nTNT治疗仍与较低的复发风险显著相关(P = 0.006)。

结论

与传统NCRT相比,在肿瘤位置和精确cTNM分期匹配的情况下,接受nTNT治疗的患者T降期更高,无远处转移生存期和无病生存期更优。当纳入另一机构接受NCRT治疗的患者时,新辅助治疗仍然是改善预后的显著多变量预测因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索