控释羟考酮/纳洛酮与控释羟考酮治疗韩国癌症相关疼痛患者的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验。

Efficacy and safety of controlled-release oxycodone/naloxone versus controlled-release oxycodone in Korean patients with cancer-related pain: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Lee Kyung-Hee, Kim Tae Won, Kang Jung-Hun, Kim Jin-Soo, Ahn Jin-Seok, Kim Sun-Young, Yun Hwan-Jung, Eum Young-Jun, Koh Sung Ae, Kim Min Kyoung, Hong Yong Sang, Kim Jeong Eun, Lee Gyeong-Won

机构信息

Department of Hematology-Oncology, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Daegu, 42415, South Korea.

Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.

出版信息

Chin J Cancer. 2017 Sep 11;36(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s40880-017-0241-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Controlled-release oxycodone/naloxone (OXN-CR) maintains the effect of opioid-induced analgesia through oxycodone while reducing the occurrence rate of opioid-induced constipation through naloxone. The present study was designed to assess the non-inferiority of OXN-CR to controlled-release oxycodone (OX-CR) for the control of cancer-related pain in Korean patients.

METHODS

In this randomized, open-labeled, parallel-group, phase IV study, we enrolled patients aged 20 years or older with moderate to severe cancer-related pain [numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score ≥4] from seven Korean oncology/hematology centers. Patients in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population were randomized (1:1) to OXN-CR or OX-CR groups. OXN-CR was administered starting at 20 mg/10 mg per day and up-titrated to a maximum of 80 mg/40 mg per day for 4 weeks, and OX-CR was administered starting at 20 mg/day and up-titrated to a maximum of 80 mg/day for 4 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in NRS pain score from baseline to week 4, with non-inferiority margin of -1.5. Secondary endpoints included analgesic rescue medication intake, patient-reported change in bowel habits, laxative intake, quality of life (QoL), and safety assessments.

RESULTS

Of the ITT population comprising 128 patients, 7 with missing primary efficacy data and 4 who violated the eligibility criteria were excluded from the efficacy analysis. At week 4, the mean change in NRS pain scores was not significantly different between the OXN-CR group (n = 58) and the OX-CR group (n = 59) (-1.586 vs. -1.559, P = 0.948). The lower limit of the one-sided 95% confidence interval (-0.776 to 0.830) for the difference exceeded the non-inferiority margin (P < 0.001). The OXN-CR and OX-CR groups did not differ significantly in terms of analgesic rescue medication intake, change in bowel habits, laxative intake, QoL, and safety assessments.

CONCLUSIONS

OXN-CR was non-inferior to OX-CR in terms of pain reduction after 4 weeks of treatment and had a similar safety profile. Studies in larger populations of Korean patients with cancer-related pain are needed to further investigate the effectiveness of OXN-CR for long-term pain control and constipation alleviation. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01313780, registered March 8, 2011.

摘要

背景

控释羟考酮/纳洛酮(OXN-CR)通过羟考酮维持阿片类药物诱导的镇痛效果,同时通过纳洛酮降低阿片类药物诱导便秘的发生率。本研究旨在评估在韩国患者中,OXN-CR在控制癌症相关疼痛方面不劣于控释羟考酮(OX-CR)。

方法

在这项随机、开放标签、平行组、IV期研究中,我们从韩国7个肿瘤/血液学中心招募了年龄在20岁及以上、患有中度至重度癌症相关疼痛[数字评分量表(NRS)疼痛评分≥4]的患者。意向性治疗(ITT)人群中的患者被随机(1:1)分为OXN-CR组或OX-CR组。OXN-CR开始剂量为每天20mg/10mg,最多滴定至每天80mg/40mg,持续4周;OX-CR开始剂量为每天20mg,最多滴定至每天80mg,持续4周。主要疗效终点是从基线到第4周NRS疼痛评分的变化,非劣效界值为-1.5。次要终点包括镇痛解救药物的摄入量、患者报告的排便习惯变化、泻药摄入量、生活质量(QoL)和安全性评估。

结果

在128例ITT人群中,7例主要疗效数据缺失和4例不符合纳入标准的患者被排除在疗效分析之外。在第4周时,OXN-CR组(n = 58)和OX-CR组(n = 59)的NRS疼痛评分平均变化无显著差异(-1.586对-1.559,P = 0.948)。差异单侧95%置信区间的下限(-0.776至0.830)超过了非劣效界值(P < 0.001)。OXN-CR组和OX-CR组在镇痛解救药物摄入量、排便习惯变化、泻药摄入量、QoL和安全性评估方面无显著差异。

结论

治疗4周后,OXN-CR在减轻疼痛方面不劣于OX-CR,且安全性相似。需要在更多韩国癌症相关疼痛患者中进行研究,以进一步探讨OXN-CR在长期疼痛控制和缓解便秘方面的有效性。试验注册ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01313780,于2011年3月8日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e055/5594448/d2f872463552/40880_2017_241_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索