评估不同筛查工具对印度南部农村绝经后妇女股骨颈骨质疏松症的预测作用

Evaluation of Different Screening Tools for Predicting Femoral Neck Osteoporosis in Rural South Indian Postmenopausal Women.

作者信息

Cherian Kripa Elizabeth, Kapoor Nitin, Shetty Sahana, Naik Dukhabandhu, Thomas Nihal, Paul Thomas V

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.

Department of Endocrinology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.

出版信息

J Clin Densitom. 2018 Jan-Mar;21(1):119-124. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Sep 27.

Abstract

The measurement of bone mineral density by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan is the "gold standard" for the diagnosis of osteoporosis, which has limited availability in many parts of India. This study was done to assess the diagnostic performance of 6 internationally validated tools (Simple Calculated Osteoporosis Risk Estimation [SCORE], age, bulk, one or never estrogen [ABONE], Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument [ORAI] and Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians [OSTA], Fracture Risk Assessment Tool [FRAX®], and calcaneal quantitative ultrasound [QUS]) for the diagnosis of osteoporosis at the femoral neck (FN). This was a cross-sectional study conducted in 2108 ambulatory South Indian rural postmenopausal women who were assessed with SCORE, ABONE, ORAI, OSTA, and FRAX® tools. QUS was performed in 850 subjects. Bone mineral density was estimated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan at the FN, and sensitivity and specificity were calculated for all tools for predicting FN osteoporosis. The receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed for each tool and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. FN osteoporosis was seen in 27%. The sensitivities of SCORE, ABONE, OSTA, ORAI, FRAX®, and QUS were 91.3%, 91.0%, 88.5%, 81.0%, 72.7%, and 81.9%, and the specificities were 36.0%, 33.5%, 41.7%, 52.0%, 60.5%, and 50.3%, respectively, for the FN osteoporosis. When the receiver operating characteristics were constructed, the AUC was good only for SCORE (0.806), and the performance of the rest was under fair category (0.713-0.766). In our large cohort of rural postmenopausal women, the SCORE screening tool was found to be useful with good sensitivity and good AUC for predicting FN osteoporosis. Thus, this tool may be used in resource-limited countries to screen the population at risk and to enable treating physicians to make appropriate management decisions.

摘要

通过双能X线吸收法扫描测量骨密度是诊断骨质疏松症的“金标准”,但在印度许多地区,这种方法的可及性有限。本研究旨在评估6种国际验证工具(简易计算骨质疏松风险评估[SCORE]、年龄、体重、雌激素使用情况[ABONE]、骨质疏松风险评估工具[ORAI]、亚洲人骨质疏松自我评估工具[OSTA]、骨折风险评估工具[FRAX®]以及跟骨定量超声[QUS])对股骨颈(FN)骨质疏松症的诊断性能。这是一项横断面研究,对2108名印度南部农村绝经后门诊女性进行了评估,使用了SCORE、ABONE、ORAI、OSTA和FRAX®工具。对850名受试者进行了QUS检查。通过双能X线吸收法扫描估算股骨颈的骨密度,并计算所有工具预测股骨颈骨质疏松症的敏感性和特异性。为每个工具构建了受试者工作特征曲线,并计算曲线下面积(AUC)。27%的女性存在股骨颈骨质疏松症。对于股骨颈骨质疏松症,SCORE、ABONE、OSTA、ORAI、FRAX®和QUS的敏感性分别为91.3%、91.0%、88.5%、81.0%、72.7%和81.9%,特异性分别为36.0%、33.5%、41.7%、52.0%、60.5%和50.3%。构建受试者工作特征曲线时,仅SCORE的AUC良好(0.806),其余工具的性能处于中等水平(0.713 - 0.766)。在我们这个大型农村绝经后女性队列中,发现SCORE筛查工具对于预测股骨颈骨质疏松症具有良好的敏感性和AUC,因此该工具可用于资源有限的国家,以筛查高危人群,并使治疗医生能够做出适当的管理决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索