Institute for Rehabilitation Medicine, Medical Faculty of the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany; Center for Health Sciences of the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Institute for Rehabilitation Medicine, Medical Faculty of the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany; Center for Health Sciences of the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Kidney Int. 2018 Feb;93(2):430-438. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.07.022. Epub 2017 Oct 14.
Impaired cognitive functioning in patients with end-stage renal disease may reduce their capabilities to adhere to complex medical or dietary regimens and to fully participate in medical decisions. With decreasing renal function, cognitive abilities are likely to decline, with cognitive dysfunction improving after initiation of dialysis and even being generally reversible after successful renal transplantation. However, little is known about cognitive changes particularly regarding different treatment modalities. To gain further insight into this, we focused on a one-year course of cognitive functions, comparing peritoneal to hemodialysis patients. Within the CORETH-project, two validated neurocognitive tests, assessing executive functioning (Trail Making Test-B) and attention (d2-Revision-Test) and the self-reported Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form Cognitive Function-subscale, were administered to 271 patients at baseline and after one year. Subsamples were matched by propensity score, adjusting for age, comorbidity, education, and employment status for 96 hemodialysis and 101 peritoneal dialysis patients. The effects of time and treatment modality were investigated, controlling for well-known confounders. Both tests revealed improvement over one year. Peritoneal dialysis was associated with better outcomes than hemodialysis at baseline and follow-up, but comparability between groups may be limited. The opposite pattern applied to self-reporting. Hemodialysis patients had to be excluded from cognitive testing more often than peritoneal dialysis patients. As such, the number of exclusions may have biased the findings, limiting generalizability. Thus, our findings suggest an improvement of cognitive functioning and support previous indications for peritoneal dialysis being associated with better cognitive functions during a one-year course than hemodialysis.
终末期肾病患者的认知功能受损可能会降低他们遵守复杂的医疗或饮食方案以及充分参与医疗决策的能力。随着肾功能的下降,认知能力可能会下降,透析开始后认知功能障碍会得到改善,甚至在成功肾移植后通常是可逆的。然而,对于认知变化,特别是不同治疗方式的认知变化,我们知之甚少。为了更深入地了解这一点,我们专注于为期一年的认知功能变化,比较了腹膜透析和血液透析患者。在 CORETH 项目中,我们对 271 名患者进行了两项经过验证的神经认知测试,评估执行功能(Trail Making Test-B)和注意力(d2-Revision-Test),以及自我报告的肾脏病生活质量简短认知功能子量表,在基线和一年后进行评估。通过倾向评分对亚组进行匹配,调整年龄、合并症、教育程度和就业状况,以匹配 96 名血液透析患者和 101 名腹膜透析患者。调查了时间和治疗方式的影响,同时控制了已知的混杂因素。两项测试均显示一年后有改善。腹膜透析在基线和随访时的结果均优于血液透析,但两组之间的可比性可能有限。自我报告的结果则相反。血液透析患者比腹膜透析患者更频繁地被排除在认知测试之外。因此,排除的人数可能会影响研究结果,限制了其普遍性。因此,我们的研究结果表明认知功能有所改善,并支持之前的研究结果,即与血液透析相比,腹膜透析在一年的过程中与更好的认知功能相关。