VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, North Hills, California.
David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, California.
J Clin Sleep Med. 2017 Dec 15;13(12):1403-1410. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.6834.
To examine whether change in caregiving status and intensity among community-dwelling older women was associated with sleep characteristics at follow-up, and whether perceived stress modified these associations.
The sample included 800 women aged 65 years or older who completed baseline and second follow-up interviews in the Caregiver-Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (Caregiver-SOF). Respondents were categorized into four groups based on change in caregiving status and intensity between the two time points: continuous noncaregivers, ceased caregivers, low-intensity caregivers (continuous caregivers with low/decreased intensity), and high-intensity caregivers (continuous caregivers with high/increased intensity or new caregivers). Perceived Stress Scale scores at the second follow-up were dichotomized into high versus low stress. Sleep outcomes at SOF Visit 8 (which overlapped with Caregiver-SOF second follow-up) included the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index total score; and actigraphy-measured total sleep time, sleep efficiency, wake after sleep onset, and sleep latency.
Multivariate-adjusted sleep characteristics did not differ significantly across caregiving groups. Among high-intensity caregivers, however, those with high stress levels had significantly longer wake after sleep onset (mean 82.3 minutes, 95% confidence interval = 70.9-93.7) than those with low stress levels (mean 65.4 minutes, 95% confidence interval = 55.2-75.7). No other sleep outcomes were modified by stress levels. Further, higher stress was significantly associated with worse Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores, regardless of the caregiving group.
Overall, sleep characteristics did not differ among noncaregivers, ceased caregivers, or those with high-/low-intensity caregiving among older women. However, subgroups of caregivers may be vulnerable to developing sleep problems, particularly those with high stress levels.
调查社区居住的老年女性的照料者状态和强度变化是否与随访时的睡眠特征相关,以及感知压力是否会改变这些关联。
本研究样本包括 800 名年龄在 65 岁及以上的女性,她们在骨质疏松性骨折照料者研究(Caregiver-SOF)中完成了基线和第二次随访访谈。根据两次时间点之间照料者状态和强度的变化,受访者被分为四组:持续非照料者、停止照料者、低强度照料者(持续照料者,强度较低/降低)和高强度照料者(持续照料者,强度较高/增加或新照料者)。第二次随访时的感知压力量表得分分为高压力和低压力。SOF 访问 8 时的睡眠结果(与 Caregiver-SOF 第二次随访重叠)包括匹兹堡睡眠质量指数总分;以及活动计测量的总睡眠时间、睡眠效率、睡眠后觉醒时间和睡眠潜伏期。
多变量调整后的睡眠特征在不同的照料组之间没有显著差异。然而,在高强度照料者中,压力水平较高的人睡眠后觉醒时间明显更长(平均 82.3 分钟,95%置信区间=70.9-93.7),而压力水平较低的人睡眠后觉醒时间(平均 65.4 分钟,95%置信区间=55.2-75.7)。其他睡眠结果不受压力水平的影响。此外,无论照料组如何,较高的压力水平与较差的匹兹堡睡眠质量指数评分显著相关。
总体而言,非照料者、停止照料者或高强度/低强度照料者的老年女性睡眠特征没有差异。然而,某些照料者亚组可能容易出现睡眠问题,特别是那些压力水平较高的人。