Suppr超能文献

强化姑息治疗综合服务:哪些模式较为适宜?跨案例分析

Enhancing integrated palliative care: what models are appropriate? A cross-case analysis.

机构信息

International Observatory on End of Life Care, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YG, UK.

Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YG, UK.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Nov 28;16(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0250-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Effective integration between hospices, palliative care services and other local health care services to support patients with palliative care needs is an important international priority. A previous model suggests that integration involves a cumulative stepped process of engagement with other organisations labelled as 'support, supplant or supplement', but the extent to which this model currently applies in the United Kingdom is unknown. We aimed to investigate accounts of hospice integration with local health care providers, using the framework provided by the model, to determine how service users and healthcare professionals perceived palliative care services and the extent of integration experienced.

METHODS

Longitudinal organisational case study methods were employed using qualitative serial interviews (interval 3 months) with patients and family carers focusing on how services responded to their needs; and group interviews with health professionals. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed by qualitative content analysis and combined across data sources.

RESULTS

The study focused on four hospices in northern England, including 34 patients (diagnosis: 17 cancer, 10 COPD, 7 heart failure), 65% female, mean age 66 (range 44-89), 13 family carers of these patients (48% partners), and 23 health care professionals. While some care fell short of expectations, all patients reported high levels of satisfaction and valued continuity of care and efficient information sharing. All hospices supported and supplemented local providers, with three hospices also supplanting local provision by providing in-patient facilities.

CONCLUSION

UK hospices predominantly operate in ways that support and supplement other providers. In addition, some also supplant local services, taking over direct responsibility and funding in-patient care. They all contributed to integration with local services, with greater blurring of boundaries than defined by the original model. Integrated care offers the necessary flexibility to respond to changes in patient needs, however, constraints from funding drivers and a lack of clear responsibilities in the UK can result in shortfalls in optimal service delivery. Integrating hospice care with local healthcare services can help to address demographic changes, predominantly more frail older people, and disease factors, including the needs of those with non-malignant conditions. This model, tested in the UK, could serve as an example for other countries.

摘要

背景

有效整合临终关怀机构、姑息治疗服务和其他当地卫生保健服务,以支持有姑息治疗需求的患者,是一项重要的国际优先事项。先前的模式表明,整合涉及与其他组织逐步接触的累积过程,这些组织被标记为“支持、替代或补充”,但目前该模式在英国的适用程度尚不清楚。我们旨在通过所提出模式的框架,调查临终关怀机构与当地卫生保健提供者的整合情况,以确定服务使用者和医疗保健专业人员如何看待姑息治疗服务以及所经历的整合程度。

方法

采用纵向组织案例研究方法,对患者和家庭照顾者进行了多次定性访谈(间隔 3 个月),重点关注服务如何满足他们的需求;并对卫生保健专业人员进行了小组访谈。对音频记录进行了转录,采用定性内容分析进行分析,并将数据来源进行了综合。

结果

该研究聚焦于英格兰北部的四家临终关怀机构,包括 34 名患者(诊断:17 例癌症,10 例 COPD,7 例心力衰竭),65%为女性,平均年龄 66 岁(范围 44-89 岁),13 名患者的家属(48%为伴侣),以及 23 名卫生保健专业人员。尽管有些护理未能达到预期,但所有患者都报告了高水平的满意度,并重视连续性护理和高效的信息共享。所有临终关怀机构都支持和补充当地服务提供者,其中有三家临终关怀机构还通过提供住院设施替代了当地服务。

结论

英国的临终关怀机构主要以支持和补充其他提供者的方式运作。此外,一些机构还替代了当地服务,直接负责并资助住院护理。它们都为与当地服务的整合做出了贡献,与最初模式定义的相比,边界更加模糊。综合护理提供了应对患者需求变化的必要灵活性,然而,英国的资金驱动因素和缺乏明确的责任限制可能导致服务提供不足。将临终关怀服务与当地医疗保健服务整合可以帮助应对人口结构变化,主要是更脆弱的老年人,以及疾病因素,包括非恶性疾病患者的需求。这种在英国测试的模式可以为其他国家提供范例。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b755/5704425/ed02bdfe1736/12904_2017_250_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验