Suppr超能文献

美国 2011-2015 年长效可逆避孕措施使用模式中的种族和民族差异。

Racial and ethnic differences in patterns of long-acting reversible contraceptive use in the United States, 2011-2015.

机构信息

Department of Population Health, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WARF Office Building Room 675, 610 Walnut Street, Madison, WI 53726, USA.

Department of Gender and Women's Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Sterling Hall Room 3309, 475 North Charter Street, Madison, WI 53706, USA.

出版信息

Contraception. 2018 May;97(5):399-404. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.01.006. Epub 2018 Feb 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether demographic, socioeconomic, and reproductive health characteristics affect long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) use differently by race-ethnicity. Results may inform the dialogue on racial pressure and bias in LARC promotion.

STUDY DESIGN

Data derived from the 2011-2013 and 2013-2015 National Surveys of Family Growth (NSFG). Our study sample included 9321 women aged 15-44. Logistic regression analyses predicted current LARC use (yes vs. no). We tested interaction terms between race-ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic) and covariates (for example, education, parity, poverty level) to explore whether their effects on LARC use vary by race-ethnicity.

RESULTS

In the race-interactions model, data did not show that low income and education predict LARC use more strongly among Black and Hispanic women than among White women. There was just one statistically significant race-interaction: experience of unintended pregnancy (p=.014). Among Whites and Hispanics, women who reported ever experiencing an unintended pregnancy had a higher predicted probability of LARC use than those who did not. On the other hand, among Black women, the experience of unintended pregnancy was not associated with a higher predicted probability of LARC use.

CONCLUSIONS

With the exception of the experience of unintended pregnancy, findings from this large, nationally representative sample of women suggest similar patterns in LARC use by race-ethnicity.

IMPLICATIONS

Results from this analysis of NSFG data do not provide evidence that observed differences in LARC use by race-ethnicity represent socioeconomic disparities, and may assuage some concerns about reproductive coercion among women of color. Nevertheless, it is absolutely critical that providers use patient-centered approaches for contraceptive counseling that promote women's autonomy in their reproductive health care decision-making.

摘要

目的

探讨人口统计学、社会经济学和生殖健康特征是否会因种族和民族的不同而对长效可逆避孕(LARC)的使用产生不同的影响。研究结果可能会为有关 LARC 推广中的种族压力和偏见的讨论提供信息。

研究设计

数据来源于 2011-2013 年和 2013-2015 年全国家庭成长调查(NSFG)。我们的研究样本包括 9321 名年龄在 15-44 岁的女性。逻辑回归分析预测了当前 LARC 的使用情况(是/否)。我们检验了种族和民族(非西班牙裔白人、非西班牙裔黑人、西班牙裔)与协变量(例如教育程度、生育次数、贫困水平)之间的交互作用项,以探讨它们对 LARC 使用的影响是否因种族和民族而异。

结果

在种族交互模型中,数据并未表明低收入和低教育程度会使黑人和西班牙裔女性比白人女性更有可能使用 LARC。只有一个统计学上显著的种族交互作用:意外怀孕经历(p=.014)。在白人和西班牙裔女性中,有过意外怀孕经历的女性比没有意外怀孕经历的女性更有可能使用 LARC。另一方面,在黑人女性中,意外怀孕经历与更高的 LARC 使用预测概率无关。

结论

除了意外怀孕经历之外,这项针对女性的大型全国代表性样本的研究结果表明,不同种族和民族的 LARC 使用模式相似。

意义

本项对 NSFG 数据的分析结果并未提供证据表明,观察到的种族和民族之间 LARC 使用的差异代表了社会经济差距,并可能减轻一些人对有色人种女性生育控制的担忧。然而,医疗服务提供者绝对必须采用以患者为中心的避孕咨询方法,促进妇女在生殖保健决策中的自主权。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验