Turner J Rick, Rodriguez Ignacio, Mantovani Emily, Gintant Gary, Kowey Peter R, Klotzbaugh Ralph J, Prasad Krishna, Sager Philip T, Stockbridge Norman, Strnadova Colette
Campbell University College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, Buies Creek, NC, USA.
Cardiac Safety Research Consortium, Roche TCRC, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Aug;58(8):997-1012. doi: 10.1002/jcph.1129. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
Multiple marketing withdrawals due to proarrhythmic concerns occurred in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom in the late 1980s to early 2000s. This primer reviews the clinical implications of a drug's identified proarrhythmic liability, the issues associated with these safety-related withdrawals, and the actions taken by the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) and by regulatory agencies in terms of changing drug development practices and introducing new nonclinical and clinical tests to asses proarrhythmic liability. ICH Guidelines S7B and E14 were released in 2005. Since then, they have been adopted by many regional regulatory authorities and have guided nonclinical and clinical proarrhythmic cardiac safety assessments during drug development. While this regulatory paradigm has been successful in preventing drugs with unanticipated potential for inducing the rare but potentially fatal polymorphic ventricular arrhythmia torsade de pointes from entering the market, it has led to the termination of drug development programs for other potentially useful medicines because of isolated results from studies with limited predictive value. Research efforts are now exploring alternative approaches to better predict potential proarrhythmic liabilities. For example, in the domain of human electrocardiographic assessments, concentration-response modeling conducted during phase 1 clinical development has recently become an accepted alternate primary methodology to the ICH E14 "thorough QT/QTc" study for defining a drug's corrected QT interval prolongation liability under certain conditions. When a drug's therapeutic benefit is considered important at a public health level but there is also an identified proarrhythmic liability that may result from administration of the single drug in certain individuals and/or drug-drug interactions, marketing approval will be accompanied by appropriate directions in the drug's prescribing information. Health-care professionals in the fields of medicine and pharmacy need to consider the prescribing information in conjunction with individual patients' clinical characteristics and concomitant medications when prescribing and dispensing such drugs.
20世纪80年代末至21世纪初,美国、加拿大和英国因对致心律失常问题的担忧,出现了多起药品撤市事件。本入门指南回顾了已确定的药物致心律失常风险的临床意义、与这些安全性相关撤市事件相关的问题,以及人用药品注册技术国际协调理事会(ICH)和监管机构在改变药物研发实践以及引入新的非临床和临床试验以评估致心律失常风险方面所采取的行动。ICH指南S7B和E14于2005年发布。自那时起,许多地区监管机构已采用这些指南,并在药物研发过程中指导了非临床和临床致心律失常心脏安全性评估。虽然这种监管模式成功地防止了具有诱发罕见但可能致命的多形性室性心律失常尖端扭转型室速意外潜力的药物进入市场,但由于预测价值有限的研究得出的孤立结果,导致其他潜在有用药物的研发项目终止。目前研究工作正在探索更好地预测潜在致心律失常风险的替代方法。例如,在人体心电图评估领域,1期临床研发期间进行的浓度-反应建模最近已成为一种公认的替代主要方法,可替代ICH E14“全面QT/QTc”研究,用于在某些条件下确定药物的校正QT间期延长风险。当一种药物的治疗益处被认为在公共卫生层面很重要,但也存在已确定的致心律失常风险,这种风险可能由某些个体使用单一药物和/或药物相互作用导致时,药品上市许可将在药品处方信息中附带适当说明。医学和药学领域的医疗保健专业人员在开具和调配此类药物时,需要结合个体患者的临床特征和合并用药情况考虑处方信息。