跟骨骨折——我们应该手术还是不应该手术?
Calcaneal Fractures - Should We or Should We not Operate?
作者信息
Rammelt Stefan, Sangeorzan Bruce J, Swords Michael P
机构信息
University Center for Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Carl-Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.
Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
出版信息
Indian J Orthop. 2018 May-Jun;52(3):220-230. doi: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_555_17.
The best treatment for displaced, intraarticular fractures of the calcaneum remains controversial. Surgical treatment of these injuries is challenging and have a considerable learning curve. Studies comparing operative with nonoperative treatment including randomized trials and meta-analyses are fraught with a considerable number of confounders including highly variable fracture patterns, soft-tissue conditions, patient characteristics, surgeon experience, limited sensitivity of outcome measures, and rehabilitation protocols. It has become apparent that there is no single treatment that is suitable for all calcaneal fractures. Treatment should be tailored to the individual fracture pathoanatomy, accompanying soft-tissue damage, associated injuries, functional demand, and comorbidities of the patient. If operative treatment is chosen, reconstruction of the overall shape of the calcaneum and joint surfaces are of utmost importance to obtain a good functional result. Despite meticulous reconstruction, primary cartilage damage due to the impact at the time of injury may lead to posttraumatic subtalar arthritis. Even if subtalar fusion becomes necessary, patients benefit from primary anatomical reconstruction of the hindfoot geometry because fusion is easier to perform and associated with better results than corrective fusion for hindfoot deformities in malunited calcaneal fractures. To minimize wound healing problems and stiffness due to scar formation after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) through extensile approaches several percutaneous and less invasive procedures through a direct approach over the sinus tarsi have successfully lowered the rates of infections and wound complications while ensuring exact anatomic reduction. There is evidence from multiple studies that malunited displaced calcaneal fractures result in painful arthritis and disabling, three-dimensional foot deformities for the affected patients. The poorest treatment results are reported after open surgical treatment that failed to achieve anatomic reconstruction of the calcaneum and its joints, thus combining the disadvantages of operative and nonoperative treatment. The crucial question, therefore, is not only whether to operate or not but also when and how to operate on calcaneal fractures if surgery is decided.
跟骨移位性关节内骨折的最佳治疗方法仍存在争议。这些损伤的手术治疗具有挑战性,且有相当长的学习曲线。比较手术治疗与非手术治疗的研究,包括随机试验和荟萃分析,存在大量混杂因素,如骨折类型高度可变、软组织状况、患者特征、外科医生经验、结局指标敏感性有限以及康复方案等。显然,没有一种单一的治疗方法适用于所有跟骨骨折。治疗应根据个体骨折的病理解剖结构、伴随的软组织损伤、相关损伤、功能需求以及患者的合并症进行调整。如果选择手术治疗,恢复跟骨和关节面的整体形状对于获得良好的功能结果至关重要。尽管进行了细致的重建,但损伤时的撞击导致的原发性软骨损伤可能会引发创伤后距下关节炎。即使有必要进行距下关节融合,患者也能从后足几何结构的初次解剖重建中获益,因为与处理跟骨骨折畸形愈合后的后足畸形的矫正融合相比,这种融合更容易实施且效果更好。为了通过扩大入路切开复位内固定(ORIF)后将伤口愈合问题和瘢痕形成导致的僵硬程度降至最低,通过跗骨窦直接入路的几种经皮和微创方法已成功降低了感染率和伤口并发症,同时确保了精确的解剖复位。多项研究表明,跟骨骨折畸形愈合会给受影响的患者带来疼痛性关节炎和致残性三维足部畸形。开放性手术治疗未能实现跟骨及其关节的解剖重建,从而兼具了手术治疗和非手术治疗的缺点,其治疗效果最差。因此,关键问题不仅在于是否进行手术,还在于如果决定手术,何时以及如何对跟骨骨折进行手术。