电刺激在术后胃肠道功能恢复中的应用:系统评价。
Electrical Stimulation and Recovery of Gastrointestinal Function Following Surgery: A Systematic Review.
机构信息
Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Auckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
出版信息
Neuromodulation. 2019 Aug;22(6):669-679. doi: 10.1111/ner.12878. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
OBJECTIVES
Postoperative ileus occurs in approximately 5-15% of patients following major abdominal surgery, and poses a substantial clinical and economic burden. Electrical stimulation has been proposed as a means to aid postoperative gastrointestinal (GI) recovery, but no methods have entered routine clinical practice. A systematic review was undertaken to assess electrical stimulation techniques and to evaluate their clinical efficacy in order to identify promising areas for future research.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Literature was searched using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar and by assessing relevant clinical trial databases. Studies investigating the use of electrical stimulation for postoperative GI recovery were included, regardless of methods used or outcomes measured. A critical review was constructed encompassing all included studies and evaluating and synthesizing stimulation techniques, protocols, and clinical outcomes.
RESULTS
A broad range of neuromodulation strategies and protocols were identified and assessed. Improved postoperative GI recovery following electrical stimulation was reported by 55% of studies (10/18), most commonly those assessing transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and electroacupuncture therapy (7/10). Several studies reported shorter time to first flatus and stool, shorter duration of hospital stay, and reduced postoperative pain. However, inconsistent reporting and limitations in trial design were common, compromising a definitive determination of electrical stimulation efficacy.
CONCLUSIONS
Electrical stimulation appears to be a promising methodology to aid postoperative GI recovery, but greater attention to mechanisms of action and clinical trial quality is necessary for progress. Future research should also aim to apply validated and standardized gut recovery outcomes and consistent neuromodulation methodologies.
目的
术后肠梗阻发生于约 5-15%的大型腹部手术后患者,造成了巨大的临床和经济负担。电刺激被提出作为一种辅助术后胃肠(GI)恢复的手段,但没有任何方法被常规应用于临床实践。本系统综述旨在评估电刺激技术,并评估其在临床疗效,以确定未来研究的有前景的领域。
材料和方法
使用 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Google Scholar 进行文献检索,并评估了相关临床试验数据库。纳入了研究电刺激在术后 GI 恢复中的应用的研究,无论使用的方法或测量的结果如何。对所有纳入的研究进行了批判性评估,评估和综合了刺激技术、方案和临床结果。
结果
确定并评估了广泛的神经调节策略和方案。55%的研究(10/18)报告了电刺激后术后 GI 恢复改善,最常见的是经皮神经电刺激和电针疗法(7/10)。几项研究报告了首次排气和排便时间缩短,住院时间缩短,术后疼痛减轻。然而,报告不一致和试验设计的局限性很常见,限制了对电刺激疗效的明确确定。
结论
电刺激似乎是一种很有前途的辅助术后 GI 恢复的方法,但需要更多关注作用机制和临床试验质量才能取得进展。未来的研究还应旨在应用经过验证和标准化的肠道恢复结果和一致的神经调节方法。